Suppr超能文献

两种扩展景深人工晶状体光学特性的实验室评估。

Laboratory evaluation of the optical properties of two extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses.

机构信息

Sungmo Eye Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology and International Vision Correction Research Centre (IVCRC), Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 14;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-1332-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To experimentally compare the optical performance of two different Extended-Depth-of-Focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) using a standardized optical bench set-up.

METHODS

In this experimental study, following IOLs were assessed: the TECNIS® Symfony ZXR00 (Johnson&Johnson, Santa Ana, USA) and the AT LARA 829MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) IOLs. The through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF) values were measured at a spatial frequency of 50 lp/mm and at aperture sizes of 2, 3, and 4.5 mm. Each IOL was measured while centered using ISO 11979-2 Model 1 (aberration-free) and Model 2 (+ 0.28 μm spherical aberration) corneas. United States Air Force (USAF) target images were also recorded for a qualitative evaluation.

RESULTS

At 2 mm pupil with ISO1 cornea, the primary and secondary foci of both IOLs appeared to merge, providing an elongated depth of focus. At 3 and 4.5 mm pupil sizes, the through-focus MTF curves of both IOLs showed a bifocal-like V-pattern. While the Symfony IOL showed an overall superior MTF values when measured with the ISO2 cornea, the opposite propensity could be observed with the AT LARA IOL. This optical behavior could be qualitatively confirmed by the USAF target images.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the two EDOF IOLs share similarities in their optical properties, the main difference lies in their optical design and performance with respect to spherical aberration. Such characteristics should be taken into account during IOL and patient selection.

摘要

背景

使用标准化的光学工作台,对两种不同的扩展景深(EDOF)人工晶状体(IOL)的光学性能进行实验比较。

方法

在这项实验研究中,评估了以下两种人工晶状体:TECNIS® Symfony ZXR00(强生,圣安娜,美国)和 AT LARA 829MP(卡尔蔡司,耶拿,德国)。在空间频率为 50 lp/mm 且孔径尺寸为 2、3 和 4.5mm 的情况下,测量了通过焦点调制传递函数(MTF)值。每种人工晶状体均在 ISO 11979-2 模型 1(无像差)和模型 2(+0.28μm 球差)角膜下进行中心测量。还记录了美国空军(USAF)目标图像,用于定性评估。

结果

在 2mm 瞳孔和 ISO1 角膜下,两种人工晶状体的主焦点和次焦点似乎融合,提供了更长的景深。在 3 和 4.5mm 瞳孔尺寸下,两种人工晶状体的通过焦点 MTF 曲线呈现出双焦点 V 形图案。当使用 ISO2 角膜测量时,Symfony 人工晶状体显示出整体较高的 MTF 值,而 AT LARA 人工晶状体则表现出相反的趋势。USAF 目标图像可以定性地证实这种光学行为。

结论

尽管这两种 EDOF IOL 在光学特性上有相似之处,但主要区别在于它们的光学设计和球差性能。在选择人工晶状体和患者时,应考虑到这些特性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e75/7023787/c79df49b99e0/12886_2020_1332_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验