Suppr超能文献

识别未来的科学家:预测其在科研训练中的坚持度。

Identifying future scientists: predicting persistence into research training.

作者信息

McGee Richard, Keller Jill L

机构信息

Mayo Graduate School and Office of Minority Student Affairs, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Winter;6(4):316-31. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-04-0020.

Abstract

This study used semistructured interviews and grounded theory to look for characteristics among college undergraduates that predicted persistence into Ph.D. and M.D./Ph.D. training. Participants in the summer undergraduate and postbaccalaureate research programs at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine were interviewed at the start, near the end, and 8-12 months after their research experience. Of more than 200 themes considered, five characteristics predicted those students who went on to Ph.D. and M.D./Ph.D. training or to M.D. training intending to do research: 1) Curiosity to discover the unknown, 2) Enjoyment of problem solving, 3) A high level of independence, 4) The desire to help others indirectly through research, and 5) A flexible, minimally structured approach to the future. Web-based surveys with different students confirmed the high frequency of curiosity and/or problem solving as the primary reason students planned research careers. No evidence was found for differences among men, women, and minority and nonminority students. Although these results seem logical compared with successful scientists, their constancy, predictive capabilities, and sharp contrast to students who chose clinical medicine were striking. These results provide important insights into selection and motivation of potential biomedical scientists and the early experiences that will motivate them toward research careers.

摘要

本研究采用半结构化访谈和扎根理论,以探寻本科大学生中能够预测其继续攻读博士学位以及医学博士/哲学博士学位的特征。对梅奥诊所医学院夏季本科及学士后研究项目的参与者,在其研究经历开始时、接近结束时以及结束8 - 12个月后进行了访谈。在考虑的200多个主题中,有五个特征能够预测哪些学生将继续攻读博士学位、医学博士/哲学博士学位或打算从事研究的医学博士学位:1)探索未知的好奇心;2)享受解决问题的过程;3)高度的独立性;4)通过研究间接帮助他人的愿望;5)对未来采取灵活、结构松散的态度。对不同学生进行的网络调查证实,好奇心和/或解决问题的能力是学生规划研究职业的主要原因,且出现频率很高。未发现男性、女性、少数族裔和非少数族裔学生之间存在差异。尽管与成功科学家相比,这些结果似乎合乎逻辑,但其稳定性、预测能力以及与选择临床医学的学生形成的鲜明对比令人瞩目。这些结果为潜在生物医学科学家的选拔和动机以及促使他们投身研究职业的早期经历提供了重要见解。

相似文献

1
Identifying future scientists: predicting persistence into research training.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Winter;6(4):316-31. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-04-0020.
2
Postbaccalaureate terminal degree and career choices of students who performed undergraduate research.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2021 Jun 1;45(2):418-425. doi: 10.1152/advan.00217.2020.
3
Biomedical Science Undergraduate Major: A New Pathway to Advance Research and the Health Professions.
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):184-192. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1361827. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
6
UCSD's short-term research training programs for trainees at different levels of career development.
Acad Psychiatry. 2007 Mar-Apr;31(2):160-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.31.2.160.
7
Medical students' perceptions in relation to ethnicity and gender: a qualitative study.
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Mar 8;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-17.
8
Encouraging minority undergraduates to choose science careers: career paths survey results.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008 Winter;7(4):394-409. doi: 10.1187/cbe.08-04-0018.
9
Biomedical Science Ph.D. Career Interest Patterns by Race/Ethnicity and Gender.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 10;9(12):e114736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114736. eCollection 2014.
10
Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Winter;6(4):297-306. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039.

引用本文的文献

1
Unmet Expectations: Life Scientists' Views on Biorisk and Responsibility.
Appl Biosaf. 2025 Jun 5;30(2):112-123. doi: 10.1089/apb.2024.0052. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Student-centered factors influencing inclusion in biomedical majors among first-year undergraduate students.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0312862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312862. eCollection 2024.
4
PROPEL: a scalable model for postbaccalaureate training to promote diversity in the biomedical workforce.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024 Dec 12;25(3):e0012224. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00122-24. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
Proxies for Success: How the Application Process Correlates to PhD Pursuit for a Small Diversity Research Program.
Sage Open. 2017 Jul-Sep;7(3). doi: 10.1177/2158244017727040. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
7
Prioritizing Mentorship as Scientific Leaders.
ACS Cent Sci. 2024 Jan 10;10(2):209-213. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.3c00500. eCollection 2024 Feb 28.
9
Motivating Proactive Biorisk Management.
Health Secur. 2023 Jan-Feb;21(1):46-60. doi: 10.1089/hs.2022.0101. Epub 2023 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Collaborative co-mentored dissertations spanning institutions: influences on student development.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Summer;6(2):119-31. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-06-0169.
2
The pipeline. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences.
Science. 2007 Apr 27;316(5824):548-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1140384.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验