van der Wal B C H, de Kramer B J, Grimm B, Vencken W, Heyligers I C, Tonino A J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Oct;128(10):1065-72. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0537-y. Epub 2007 Dec 6.
In a consecutive series of 64 patients with an ABG-II stem, we analyzed whether the tightness of the fit of the prosthesis affected bone remodeling and if there was a relation between clinical and radiological results.
Radiographic analysis of bone remodeling in different Gruen zones was done. Bone density changes were graded as present or absent in the AP and lateral radiographs as compared with the previous sets of radiographs. Bone remodeling was compared to literature values of the ABG-I stem. Three stem levels were defined. The proximal level was set at the upper border of the lesser trochanter, the mid-stem level at halfway the stem and the distal level 1 cm above the tip of the prosthesis. Femoral fit was defined as tight when the ratio of the fit was >/=0.8 and as non-tight if the fit was <0.8. The incidence of thigh pain was scored using the Merle d'Aubigne (MdA) hip score.
Proximal bone resorption in Gruen zone 1 was 26.6% and in zone 7, 34.4% compared to 48 and 45% for the ABG-I stem after 5 years. No correlation was found between femoral fit and radiological changes. Proximal and distal fit was significantly lower for patients with thigh pain than without thigh pain. Patients with a non-tight proximal fit produced significantly more varus (17/30 = 56.7%) than patients with a tight proximal fit (2/34 = 5.9%; P < 0.01).
Femoral fit in ABG-II does not predict certain radiological changes, but less proximal bone resorption confirms the design changes from ABG-I to ABG-II. A non-tight proximal fit is correlated with varus position of the stem. Thigh pain is correlated with a poor fit and fill of the femoral stem.
在连续的64例使用ABG-II型股骨柄的患者中,我们分析了假体的贴合紧密程度是否会影响骨重塑,以及临床和放射学结果之间是否存在关联。
对不同Gruen分区的骨重塑进行影像学分析。与之前的X线片相比,在前后位和侧位X线片上评估骨密度变化,分为有或无变化。将骨重塑情况与ABG-I型股骨柄的文献值进行比较。定义了三个股骨柄水平。近端水平设定在小转子上缘,柄中部水平设定在柄的中点,远端水平设定在假体尖端上方1厘米处。当贴合率≥0.8时,股骨贴合被定义为紧密;当贴合率<0.8时,则定义为不紧密。使用Merle d'Aubigne(MdA)髋关节评分对大腿疼痛的发生率进行评分。
与ABG-I型股骨柄5年后Gruen 1区近端骨吸收48%、7区34.4%相比,ABG-II型股骨柄Gruen 1区近端骨吸收为26.6%,7区为34.4%。未发现股骨贴合与放射学变化之间存在相关性。有大腿疼痛的患者近端和远端贴合度明显低于无大腿疼痛的患者。近端贴合不紧密的患者产生内翻的比例(17/30 = 56.7%)明显高于近端贴合紧密的患者(2/34 = 5.9%;P < 0.01)。
ABG-II型股骨柄的股骨贴合度无法预测某些放射学变化,但较少的近端骨吸收证实了从ABG-I型到ABG-II型的设计改进。近端贴合不紧密与股骨柄的内翻位置相关。大腿疼痛与股骨柄的贴合不佳和填充不足相关。