Denduluri Neelima, Yang Sherry X, Berman Arlene W, Nguyen Diana, Liewehr David J, Steinberg Seth M, Swain Sandra M
Breast Cancer Section, Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Heath, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Cancer Biol Ther. 2008 Jan;7(1):15-20. doi: 10.4161/cbt.7.1.5337. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
Noninvasive markers of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy are needed. Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule (sVCAM-1), soluble VEGF receptor-2 (sVEGFR-2), and plasma VEGF levels were assessed as potential biomarkers of therapy with bevacizumab. Tumor samples were evaluated for VEGFR-2 mutations before and after bevacizumab.
Twenty-one patients with breast cancer underwent neoadjuvant treatment with bevacizumab for 1 cycle followed by 6 cycles of bevacizumab, chemotherapy, and filgrastim. Peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline, post cycles 1, 4 and 7. sVCAM-1, VEGF and sVEGFR-2 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Exons 17-26 of VEGFR-2 were sequenced on tissue samples from 20 patients at baseline and post cycle 1 to evaluate for tumor mutations.
From baseline to post cycle 1, sVCAM-1 and sVEGFR-2 values increased by a median of 180.5 ng/ml (p < 0.0001) and 1927 ng/ml respectively (p = 0.0003). Baseline VEGF, sVEGFR-2, and sVCAM-1 levels nor changes in sVEGFR-2 and sVCAM-1 levels were associated with clinical response. Median baseline sVEGFR-2 levels were 11322 ng/ml and 7524 ng/ml in patients with (n = 5) and without (n = 6) wound healing problems respectively, (p = 0.052). In 40 samples where tumor VEGFR-2 sequencing was obtained, no mutations were seen compared to the reference sequence.
sVCAM-1 and sVEGFR-2 values increased significantly after treatment with bevacizumab, possibly due to compensatory mechanisms secondary to VEGF inhibition. sVEGFR-2 levels were somewhat higher in patients with wound healing problems and may potentially predict patients at higher risk of this complication. There were no tumor VEGFR-2 mutations.
需要抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗的非侵入性标志物。评估可溶性血管细胞粘附分子(sVCAM-1)、可溶性VEGF受体-2(sVEGFR-2)和血浆VEGF水平作为贝伐单抗治疗的潜在生物标志物。在贝伐单抗治疗前后对肿瘤样本进行VEGFR-2突变评估。
21例乳腺癌患者接受1周期贝伐单抗新辅助治疗,随后进行6周期贝伐单抗、化疗和非格司亭治疗。在基线、第1、4和7周期后采集外周血样本。通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)测量sVCAM-1、VEGF和sVEGFR-2水平。对20例患者基线和第1周期后的组织样本进行VEGFR-2外显子17-26测序,以评估肿瘤突变。
从基线到第1周期后,sVCAM-1和sVEGFR-2值分别中位数增加180.5 ng/ml(p < 0.0001)和1927 ng/ml(p = 0.0003)。基线VEGF、sVEGFR-2和sVCAM-1水平以及sVEGFR-2和sVCAM-1水平的变化与临床反应无关。有(n = 5)和无(n = 6)伤口愈合问题的患者基线sVEGFR-2水平中位数分别为11322 ng/ml和7524 ng/ml,(p = 0.052)。在获得肿瘤VEGFR-2测序的40个样本中,与参考序列相比未发现突变。
贝伐单抗治疗后sVCAM-1和sVEGFR-2值显著增加,可能是由于VEGF抑制后的代偿机制。有伤口愈合问题的患者sVEGFR-2水平略高,可能潜在预测该并发症风险较高的患者。未发现肿瘤VEGFR-2突变。