• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床信息系统实施的结果评估:实用指南

Outcomes assessment of clinical information system implementation: a practical guide.

作者信息

Nahm Eun-Shim, Vaydia Vinay, Ho Danny, Scharf Barbara, Seagull Jake

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Nursing, 655 W. Lombard St, Suite 455C, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2007 Nov-Dec;55(6):282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.003
PMID:18061012
Abstract

Healthcare information systems (HIS) play a vital role in quality of care and the organization's daily operations. Consequently, increasing numbers of clinicians have been involved in HIS implementation, particularly for clinical information systems (CIS). Implementation of these systems is a major organizational investment, and its outcomes must be assessed. The purpose of this article is to provide clinicians and frontline informaticians with a practical guide to assess these outcomes, focusing on outcome variables, assessment methods, and timing of assessment. Based on in-depth literature reviews and their empirical experiences, the authors identified 3 frequently used outcomes: user satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and financial impact. These outcomes have been assessed employing various methods, including randomized controlled trials, pre- and post-test studies, time and motion studies, surveys, and user testing. The timing for outcomes assessments varied depending on several factors, such as learning curves or patients conditions. In conclusion, outcomes assessment is essential for the success of healthcare information technology, and the CIS implementation team members must be prepared to conduct and/or facilitate these studies.

摘要

医疗保健信息系统(HIS)在医疗质量和组织日常运营中发挥着至关重要的作用。因此,越来越多的临床医生参与到HIS的实施中,尤其是临床信息系统(CIS)。这些系统的实施是一项重大的组织投资,其结果必须进行评估。本文的目的是为临床医生和一线信息专家提供一份评估这些结果的实用指南,重点关注结果变量、评估方法和评估时机。基于深入的文献综述及其实证经验,作者确定了3个常用的结果:用户满意度、临床结果和财务影响。这些结果已通过各种方法进行评估,包括随机对照试验、前后测试研究、时间与动作研究、调查和用户测试。结果评估的时机因多种因素而异,如学习曲线或患者状况。总之,结果评估对于医疗信息技术的成功至关重要,CIS实施团队成员必须准备好进行和/或推动这些研究。

相似文献

1
Outcomes assessment of clinical information system implementation: a practical guide.临床信息系统实施的结果评估:实用指南
Nurs Outlook. 2007 Nov-Dec;55(6):282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.003.
2
The relationship between super users' attitudes and employee experiences with clinical information systems.超级用户的态度与员工使用临床信息系统的体验之间的关系。
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Feb;66(1):82-96. doi: 10.1177/1077558708325984. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
3
Development of a measure of clinical information systems expectations and experiences.临床信息系统期望与体验测量方法的开发。
Med Care. 2007 Sep;45(9):884-90. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180653625.
4
Human factors considerations relevant to CPOE implementations.与计算机化医师医嘱录入系统实施相关的人为因素考量
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2005 Summer;19(3):71-8.
5
Using technology to reduce medication errors.利用技术减少用药错误。
Nursing. 2009 Jun;39(6):57-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000352344.05890.ba.
6
Data warehouse approach to nursing management.护理管理的数据仓库方法。
J Nurs Manag. 2007 Mar;15(2):155-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00690.x.
7
Differences in doctors' and nurses' assessments of hospital culture and their views about computerised order entry systems.医生和护士对医院文化的评估差异以及他们对计算机化医嘱录入系统的看法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:15-20.
8
Nurses' experiences using a nursing information system: early stage of technology implementation.护士使用护理信息系统的体验:技术实施的早期阶段
Comput Inform Nurs. 2007 Sep-Oct;25(5):294-300. doi: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000289166.61863.0b.
9
Computerized provider order entry system field research: the impact of contextual factors on study implementation.计算机化医嘱录入系统实地研究:情境因素对研究实施的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Oct-Nov;75(10-11):730-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.10.002. Epub 2005 Dec 2.
10
Nursing standards to support the electronic health record.支持电子健康记录的护理标准。
Nurs Outlook. 2008 Sep-Oct;56(5):258-266.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.06.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of nursing management information systems: a systematic review.护理管理信息系统的有效性:一项系统综述。
Healthc Inform Res. 2014 Oct;20(4):249-57. doi: 10.4258/hir.2014.20.4.249. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
2
Determining of factors influencing the success and failure of hospital information system and their evaluation methods: a systematic review.影响医院信息系统成败的因素及其评估方法的确定:一项系统综述
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Dec;15(12):e11716. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.11716. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
3
Role of computerized physician order entry usability in the reduction of prescribing errors.
计算机化医嘱录入的可用性在减少处方错误中的作用。
Healthc Inform Res. 2013 Jun;19(2):93-101. doi: 10.4258/hir.2013.19.2.93. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
4
A nursing informatics research agenda for 2008-18: contextual influences and key components.2008 - 2018年护理信息学研究议程:背景影响与关键要素
Nurs Outlook. 2008 Sep-Oct;56(5):206-214.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.06.007.