Griffiths C E, Bailey J R, Jarad F D, Youngson C C
BDS Liverpool, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
J Dent. 2008 Jan;36(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
To assess the most efficacious method of treating stained teeth: bleaching alone, veneering alone or a combination of bleaching and veneering and whether the choice alters depending on the degree of staining.
Extracted teeth were sectioned to give 117 samples. These samples were split into unstained, lightly and darkly stained groups based on CIE-Lab value L*. The lightly and darkly stained groups were stained using tea. Teeth from each group were then assigned to one of four subgroups (control (C), bleaching alone (B), veneering alone (V), or a combination of bleaching and veneering (BV), each containing 13 samples. Veneering was performed using 0.8-mm thick ceramic veneer of shade B1. CIE-Lab values were recorded using a spectrophotometer and the colour difference (Delta E) was calculated for each intervention. The final colour was compared to the value for obtained from a B1 (Vita) Shade tab. Statistical significance was assessed using analysis of variance.
In all three test groups, intervention resulted in a statistically significant colour change compared to the C group (p<or=0.001). In the unstained group, the only intervention that reached statistically significant parity to B1 was BV (p=0.015). In the lightly stained group, BV produced the most colour change and the value closest to B1 (p<or=0.003). In dark group, BV produced the greatest colour change and the value closest to B1 however; this was not statistically significantly better than V (p=0.146).
All the interventions produced a statistically significant and clinically visible colour change compared to the control. External light-activated bleaching produced a clinically visible colour change. In all groups the combination of bleaching and veneering gave the closest value to B1.
评估治疗变色牙的最有效方法:单独漂白、单独贴面或漂白与贴面联合使用,以及选择是否因染色程度而异。
将拔除的牙齿切片,得到117个样本。根据CIE-Lab值L*将这些样本分为未染色、轻度染色和重度染色组。轻度和重度染色组用茶进行染色。然后将每组牙齿分配到四个亚组之一(对照组(C)、单独漂白组(B)、单独贴面组(V)或漂白与贴面联合组(BV)),每组包含13个样本。使用厚度为0.8毫米、颜色为B1的陶瓷贴面进行贴面。使用分光光度计记录CIE-Lab值,并计算每次干预的色差(ΔE)。将最终颜色与从B1(维他)色板获得的值进行比较。使用方差分析评估统计学显著性。
在所有三个测试组中,与C组相比,干预导致了具有统计学显著性的颜色变化(p≤0.001)。在未染色组中,唯一与B1达到统计学显著性相当的干预是BV组(p = 0.015)。在轻度染色组中,BV组产生的颜色变化最大,且值最接近B1(p≤0.003)。在重度染色组中,BV组产生的颜色变化最大,且值最接近B1;然而,这在统计学上并不比V组显著更好(p = 0.146)。
与对照组相比,所有干预均产生了具有统计学显著性且临床上可见的颜色变化。外源性光活化漂白产生了临床上可见的颜色变化。在所有组中,漂白与贴面联合使用得到的值最接近B1。