Ermis R Banu, Uzer Celik Esra, Yildiz Gul, Yazkan Basak
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey Turkey.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018 Spring;12(2):120-127. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2018.019. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
The use of trayless at-home bleaching agents in darker teeth is raising some concerns due to their unknown efficacy. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of tooth discolouration severity on the efficacy and colour stability of two different trayless at-home bleaching systems. Ninety enamel-dentin samples were divided into two groups: lighter tand darker teeth. The teeth in each group were further divided into three groups (n=15): (1) tray-based system with 10% carbamide peroxide (Opalescence Oh) (control group); (2) a tray applied whitening membrane with 10% hydrogen peroxide (Treswhite Supreme); and (3) a whitening pen with 22% carbamide peroxide (Hollywood Smiles). After bleaching, the teeth were stained for 9 days using red wine. Colour readings before bleaching treatment were determined using a dental spectrophotometer and were repeated 24 h after bleaching treatment and 24 h after staining process. Analysis of variance, Bonferroni and Dunnett C tests were used at 5% significance level. No differences were observed between the bleaching efficacy of Treswhite Supreme and Opalescence Oh in the lighter teeth, while Opalescence Oh had the best bleaching efficacy in the darker teeth (p<0.05). Hollywood Smiles had the worst bleaching efficay but the best color stability in both lighter and darker teeth (p<0.05). No differences were observed between the color stability values of Treswhite Supreme and Opalescence Oh. This study suggested that both the tooth discolouration severity and the type of trayless system used affected the bleaching efficacy, whereas only the type of trayless system affected the color stability.
由于疗效未知,在家中使用无托盘漂白剂对较深色牙齿进行美白引起了一些担忧。本体外研究的目的是评估牙齿变色严重程度对两种不同的无托盘家用漂白系统的疗效和颜色稳定性的影响。90个牙釉质 - 牙本质样本被分为两组:较浅色牙齿组和较深色牙齿组。每组牙齿进一步分为三组(n = 15):(1)含10%过氧化脲的托盘式系统(皓齿美白)(对照组);(2)含10%过氧化氢的无托盘美白贴膜(至尊白);(3)含22%过氧化脲的美白笔(好莱坞微笑)。漂白后,用红酒对牙齿进行9天的染色。在漂白处理前使用牙科分光光度计测定颜色读数,并在漂白处理后24小时和染色过程后24小时重复测定。采用方差分析、Bonferroni检验和Dunnett C检验,显著性水平为5%。在较浅色牙齿中,至尊白和皓齿美白的漂白效果没有差异,而在较深色牙齿中,皓齿美白的漂白效果最佳(p<0.05)。好莱坞微笑在较浅色和较深色牙齿中的漂白效果最差,但颜色稳定性最佳(p<0.05)。至尊白和皓齿美白的颜色稳定性值没有差异。本研究表明,牙齿变色严重程度和所使用的无托盘系统类型均会影响漂白效果,而只有无托盘系统类型会影响颜色稳定性。