Matos Sérgio M, Guerra Fernando A, Krauser Jack, Marques Francisco, Ermida Jorge M, Sanz Mariano
Department of Dental Medicine, Stomatology, and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
J Periodontol. 2007 Oct;78(10):1855-63. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060474.
This prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial study compared the clinical outcomes of the biomaterial anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix/cell-binding peptide (ABM/P-15) as a biocompatible hydrogel carrier consisting of carboxymethylcellulose and glycerol or in particulate form when used as a bone replacement graft in the treatment of human periodontal infrabony defects.
Nineteen patients with advanced chronic periodontitis were recruited. All patients had at least two non-adjacent intrabony osseous defects > or = 3 mm after completion of cause-related periodontal therapy. The surgical procedures included access flaps for root instrumentation and filling the defect with ABM/P-15 in hydrogel or particulate form. Reentry access flap surgery was performed at 6 months. Changes in soft and hard tissue outcome measurements between baseline and 6 months were evaluated in all defects.
At 6 months, no significant differences between ABM/P-15 hydrogel and ABM/P-15 particulate were demonstrated for the amount of defect fill (3.10 +/- 0.85 mm [75.0%] versus 3.09 +/- 1.11 mm [73.7%], respectively) or defect resolution (85.8% versus 81.9%). Changes in soft tissue clinical outcomes did not show significant differences between the treatments.
This trial failed to demonstrate superiority of the novel ABM/P-15 hydrogel therapeutic modality over the standard ABM/ P-15 particulate graft in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects.
这项前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验研究比较了生物材料无机牛源羟基磷灰石基质/细胞结合肽(ABM/P-15)作为一种生物相容性水凝胶载体(由羧甲基纤维素和甘油组成)或颗粒形式,在治疗人类牙周骨下袋缺损时用作骨替代移植物的临床效果。
招募了19例晚期慢性牙周炎患者。所有患者在完成与病因相关的牙周治疗后,至少有两个不相邻的骨内骨缺损≥3mm。手术步骤包括翻瓣进行牙根器械操作,并用水凝胶或颗粒形式的ABM/P-15填充缺损。6个月时进行再次翻瓣手术。评估所有缺损在基线和6个月之间软硬组织结果测量的变化。
6个月时,ABM/P-15水凝胶和ABM/P-15颗粒在缺损填充量(分别为3.10±0.85mm[75.0%]和3.09±1.11mm[73.7%])或缺损修复率(85.8%对81.9%)方面未显示出显著差异。治疗之间软组织临床结果的变化未显示出显著差异。
该试验未能证明新型ABM/P-15水凝胶治疗方式在治疗牙周骨内缺损方面优于标准的ABM/P-15颗粒移植物。