Chambers Julie A, McInnes Rhona J, Hoddinott Pat, Alder Elizabeth M
Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Breastfeed Rev. 2007 Nov;15(3):17-25.
In order to support breastfeeding interventions, there is a need for objective, reliable, valid and sensitive measures of factors related to breastfeeding. Publications on the development and testing of tools measuring mothers' knowledge, attitudes, confidence or self-efficiency and/or satisfaction towards breastfeeding were systematically reviewed. Twenty-two papers evaluating 13 self-report measures matched our selection criteria, and were critically appraised by two independent reviewers. All scales were tested with pregnant women or breastfeeding mothers. The 13 measures varied markedly in ease of completion and cultural appropriateness and none reached our highest level of evidence grading. Four of the measures had sufficient evidence to support their use, including the Breastfeeding Attrition Prediction Tool, the Modified Breastfeeding Evaluation Scale, the Breastfeeding Self-Efficiency Scale and the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale. There has been a tendency to develop new measures rather than evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of existing measures, particularly in different populations.
为了支持母乳喂养干预措施,需要有客观、可靠、有效且灵敏的与母乳喂养相关因素的测量方法。对有关测量母亲对母乳喂养的知识、态度、信心或自我效能感和/或满意度的工具的开发与测试的出版物进行了系统综述。22篇评估13种自我报告测量方法的论文符合我们的选择标准,并由两名独立评审员进行了严格评估。所有量表均在孕妇或母乳喂养母亲中进行了测试。这13种测量方法在完成的难易程度和文化适宜性方面差异显著,且均未达到我们的最高证据分级水平。其中四种测量方法有足够的证据支持其使用,包括母乳喂养损耗预测工具、改良母乳喂养评估量表、母乳喂养自我效能量表和爱荷华婴儿喂养态度量表。人们倾向于开发新的测量方法,而不是评估现有测量方法的优缺点,尤其是在不同人群中。