• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在72小时内复诊的急诊科患者中使用查尔森合并症指数。

The use of Charlson comorbidity index for patients revisiting the emergency department within 72 hours.

作者信息

Wang Han-Yi, Chew Ghee, Kung Chia-Te, Chung Kun-Jung, Lee Wen-Huei

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Chang Gung Med J. 2007 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-44.

PMID:18062175
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To validate the use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) for predicting admission of patients revisiting the Emergency Department (ED) within 72 hours.

METHODS

Non-trauma patients aged above 17 years old who revisited an urban ED within 72 hours during January of 2004 were included in this retrospective observational study. Demographic data, diagnosis, CCI, in-hospital mortality rate and length of hospital stay were reviewed, and comparisons were made between the patients who were admitted or discharged on their return visits.

RESULTS

Of the 168 enrolled patients, 60 were admitted to a ward and 108 were discharged. Revisiting patients with high CCIs (> or = 2) had a higher admission rate (67.3% vs. 22.7%; p < 0.001) and an increased adjusted odds ratio of admission (odds ratio (OR) 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-3.75) than low CCI patients. Admitted revisiting patients with high CCIs had poorer prognoses, longer hospital stays (11.79 +/- 8.92 days vs. 6.78 +/- 5.17 days; p < 0.05) and a higher in-hospital mortality rate (15.2% vs. 3.7%; p = 0.209).

CONCLUSION

CCI was well correlated with the admission possibility of patients revisiting the ED within 72 hours. More clinical management and discharge strategies should target those revisiting patients who have more comorbidities.

摘要

背景

验证使用查尔森合并症指数(CCI)预测患者在72小时内再次就诊于急诊科(ED)时是否会入院。

方法

本回顾性观察研究纳入了2004年1月期间在72小时内再次就诊于城市急诊科的17岁以上非创伤患者。回顾了人口统计学数据、诊断、CCI、住院死亡率和住院时间,并对复诊时入院或出院的患者进行了比较。

结果

在168名纳入研究的患者中,60名被收入病房,108名出院。CCI高(≥2)的复诊患者入院率更高(67.3%对22.7%;p<0.001),与CCI低的患者相比,调整后的入院比值比增加(比值比(OR)2.06;95%置信区间(CI)1.14 - 3.75)。CCI高的复诊入院患者预后较差,住院时间更长(11.79±8.92天对6.78±5.17天;p<0.05),住院死亡率更高(15.2%对3.7%;p = 0.209)。

结论

CCI与患者在72小时内再次就诊于急诊科时的入院可能性密切相关。更多的临床管理和出院策略应针对合并症更多的复诊患者。

相似文献

1
The use of Charlson comorbidity index for patients revisiting the emergency department within 72 hours.在72小时内复诊的急诊科患者中使用查尔森合并症指数。
Chang Gung Med J. 2007 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-44.
2
Charlson Index is associated with one-year mortality in emergency department patients with suspected infection.查尔森指数与急诊科疑似感染患者的一年死亡率相关。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 May;13(5):530-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.11.084. Epub 2006 Mar 21.
3
Risk factors and prognostic predictors of unexpected intensive care unit admission within 3 days after ED discharge.急诊出院后3天内意外入住重症监护病房的危险因素及预后预测因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;25(9):1009-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.03.005.
4
Predictors of pediatric emergency patients discharged against medical advice.违背医嘱出院的儿科急诊患者的预测因素。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009 Apr;48(3):263-70. doi: 10.1177/0009922808323109. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
5
The recidivism characteristics of an emergency department observation unit.急诊科观察单元的累犯特征。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
6
Outcomes of patients admitted to tertiary intensive care units after interhospital transfer: comparison with patients admitted from emergency departments.院际转运后入住三级重症监护病房患者的结局:与急诊科收治患者的比较。
Crit Care Resusc. 2008 Jun;10(2):97-105.
7
The association between length of emergency department boarding and mortality.急诊科滞留时间与死亡率之间的关联。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1324-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01236.x.
8
The use and effectiveness of an emergency department observation unit for elderly patients.急诊科观察单元在老年患者中的应用及效果
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 May;41(5):668-77. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.153.
9
Comparison of characteristics of admitted emergency department patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the ICU and non-ICU setting.重症监护病房(ICU)和非ICU环境下需要心肺复苏的急诊入院患者特征比较。
Emerg Med J. 2008 Feb;25(2):83-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.051920.
10
Unplanned admission to intensive care after emergency hospitalisation: risk factors and development of a nomogram for individualising risk.急诊住院后意外入住重症监护病房:风险因素及个体化风险列线图的制定
Resuscitation. 2009 Feb;80(2):224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.10.030. Epub 2008 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The risk factors of the 72-h unscheduled return visit admission to emergency department in adults below 50 years old.50 岁以下成年人急诊 72 小时内非计划性再次就诊的风险因素。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Sep 27;28(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01317-x.
2
Predictors of 72-h unscheduled return visits with admission in patients presenting to the emergency department with abdominal pain.以腹痛为主诉至急诊科就诊患者 72 小时内非计划性再就诊并入院的预测因素。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Aug 17;28(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01256-7.
3
Associations of Patient Race and Ethnicity With Emergency Department Disposition for Mental Health Visits in the United States.
患者种族和民族与美国精神科急诊就诊的处置之间的关联。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 26;84(5):22m14661. doi: 10.4088/JCP.22m14661.
4
Effect of Interposed Abdominal Compression on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcomes; a Randomized Clinical Trial.置入式腹部按压对心肺复苏结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 16;10(1):e57. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1678. eCollection 2022.
5
Predicting Unscheduled Emergency Department Return Visits Among Older Adults: Population-Based Retrospective Study.预测老年人非计划急诊复诊情况:基于人群的回顾性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jul 28;9(7):e22491. doi: 10.2196/22491.
6
Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department.急诊科72小时复诊入院的危险因素。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2020 Dec 24;33(2):169-174. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_155_20. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
7
Geriatric emergency department revisits after discharge with Potentially Inappropriate Medications: A retrospective cohort study.出院后因潜在不适当用药而再次就诊于老年急诊科:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;44:148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
8
Characteristics and related factors of emergency department visits, readmission, and hospital transfers of inpatients under a DRG-based payment system: A nationwide cohort study.基于按疾病诊断相关分组付费的住院患者急诊就诊、再入院和院内转科的特征及其相关因素:一项全国性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 9;15(12):e0243373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243373. eCollection 2020.
9
Unusual Fatigue and Failure to Utilize EMS Are Associated With Prolonged Prehospital Delay for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.不寻常的疲劳和未能使用紧急医疗服务与疑似急性冠状动脉综合征的院前延迟时间延长有关。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2020 Dec;19(4):206-212. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000245.
10
Large observational study on risks predicting emergency department return visits and associated disposition deviations.关于预测急诊科复诊风险及相关处置偏差的大型观察性研究。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;6(2):144-151. doi: 10.15441/ceem.18.024. Epub 2019 May 7.