Russo Sebastian G, Eich Christoph, Barwing Jürgen, Nickel Eike A, Braun Ulrich, Graf Bernhard M, Timmermann Arnd
Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Georg-August University, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
J Clin Anesth. 2007 Nov;19(7):517-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.04.007.
To evaluate the influence of a simulator-aided course for airway management on participants' daily clinical airway management practice.
Survey instrument.
University hospital.
88 participants who attended a simulator-aided course for airway management.
Six mo after 4 consecutive courses with identical structure and content, participants were mailed a standardized questionnaire to answer.
Of 88 participants queried, 48 completed the questionnaire. Ninety-two percent had experienced a difficult airway situation in the 6 mo after the course. Fourteen (29%) evaluated predictors for a difficult airway more carefully. Fourteen (29%) established structural changes within their departments. Ten (21%) participants acquired new technical airway devices. The mean estimated impact on the participants' rating for lectures, skill stations, and scenarios on a scale from 1 (very helpful) to 6 (not at all helpful) was 2.8 for lectures, 1.6 for skill stations, and 1.4 for scenarios.
Attendance at a simulator-aided airway management course has a significant impact on self-reported accuracy and confidence in evaluation of airways, use of alternative airway devices, and changes in the practitioner's clinical practice toward difficult airway situations.
评估气道管理模拟辅助课程对参与者日常临床气道管理实践的影响。
调查工具。
大学医院。
88名参加气道管理模拟辅助课程的人员。
在连续参加4次结构和内容相同的课程6个月后,向参与者邮寄标准化问卷以供回答。
在88名被调查的参与者中,48人完成了问卷。92%的人在课程结束后的6个月内遇到过困难气道情况。14人(29%)更仔细地评估了困难气道的预测因素。14人(29%)在其所在科室进行了结构调整。10人(21%)的参与者获得了新的气道技术设备。对于讲座、技能站和模拟场景,参与者在1(非常有帮助)至6(完全没有帮助)的评分量表上对其估计影响的平均值,讲座为2.8,技能站为1.6,模拟场景为1.4。
参加气道管理模拟辅助课程对自我报告的气道评估准确性和信心、替代气道设备的使用以及从业者对困难气道情况的临床实践变化有显著影响。