Fulcher Caryl D, Gosselin-Acomb Tracy K
Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007 Dec;11(6):817-21. doi: 10.1188/07.CJON.817-821.
Most nurses agree that incorporating evidence into practice is necessary to provide quality care, but barriers such as time, resources, and knowledge often interfere with the actual implementation of practice change. Published practice guidelines are one source to direct practice; this article focuses on the use of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oncology: Distress Management, which articulate standards and demonstrate assessment for psychosocial distress. Planning for the implementation of the guidelines in a feasibility pilot in a busy radiation oncology clinic is described. Results indicate that adding a distress assessment using the distress thermometer and problem checklist did not present substantial burden to nurses in the clinic or overwhelm the mental health, pastoral care, or oncology social work referral sources with more patients. Understanding distress scores and problems identified by patients helped the nurses direct education interventions and referrals appropriately; improved patient satisfaction scores reflected this.
大多数护士都认为,将循证实践纳入其中对于提供优质护理是必要的,但时间、资源和知识等障碍常常会干扰实践变革的实际实施。已发布的实践指南是指导实践的一个来源;本文重点关注美国国立综合癌症网络(National Comprehensive Cancer Network)的《肿瘤临床实践指南:痛苦管理》(Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oncology: Distress Management)的使用,该指南明确了标准并展示了对心理社会痛苦的评估。文中描述了在一家繁忙的放射肿瘤诊所进行可行性试点时实施该指南的规划。结果表明,使用痛苦温度计和问题清单进行痛苦评估,并未给诊所的护士带来沉重负担,也没有使心理健康、牧师关怀或肿瘤社会工作转诊资源因患者增多而不堪重负。了解患者的痛苦评分和所发现的问题有助于护士合理地指导教育干预措施和转诊;患者满意度评分的提高就反映了这一点。