• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的电话癌症援助热线运营商、癌症患者及其照顾者对痛苦温度计和问题清单的可接受性。

Acceptability of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List to community-based telephone cancer helpline operators, and to cancer patients and carers.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2011 Jan 31;11:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-46.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-11-46
PMID:21281476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3040161/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer can be a distressing experience for cancer patients and carers, impacting on psychological, social, physical and spiritual functioning. However, health professionals often fail to detect distress in their patients due to time constraints and a lack of experience. Also, with the focus on the patient, carer needs are often overlooked. This study investigated the acceptability of brief distress screening with the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List (PL) to operators of a community-based telephone helpline, as well as to cancer patients and carers calling the service.

METHODS

Operators (n = 18) monitored usage of the DT and PL with callers (cancer patients/carers, >18 years, and English-speaking) from September-December 2006 (n = 666). The DT is a single item, 11-point scale to rate level of distress. The associated PL identifies the cause of distress.

RESULTS

The DT and PL were used on 90% of eligible callers, most providing valid responses. Benefits included having an objective, structured and consistent means for distress screening and triage to supportive care services. Reported challenges included apparent inappropriateness of the tools due to the nature of the call or level of caller distress, the DT numeric scale, and the level of operator training.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed positive outcomes to using the DT and PL, although operators reported some challenges. Overcoming these challenges may improve distress screening particularly by less experienced clinicians, and further development of the PL items and DT scale may assist with administration. The DT and PL allow clinicians to direct/prioritise interventions or referrals, although ongoing training and support is critical in distress screening.

摘要

背景

癌症可能会给癌症患者及其护理人员带来困扰,影响他们的心理、社会、身体和精神功能。然而,由于时间限制和缺乏经验,卫生专业人员往往无法发现患者的痛苦。此外,由于关注的是患者,护理人员的需求往往被忽视。本研究调查了使用《 distress thermometer(DT)和 problem list(PL)》对社区电话热线操作人员以及拨打该服务电话的癌症患者和护理人员进行简短痛苦筛查的可接受性。

方法

2006 年 9 月至 12 月,操作人员(n=18)监测了 DT 和 PL 在来电者(年龄>18 岁且讲英语的癌症患者/护理人员)中的使用情况(n=666)。DT 是一个 11 分制的单一项目,用于评估痛苦程度。相关的 PL 确定痛苦的原因。

结果

DT 和 PL 用于 90%符合条件的来电者,大多数人提供了有效回复。好处包括有一个客观、结构化和一致的痛苦筛查和分诊到支持性护理服务的方法。报告的挑战包括由于来电的性质或来电者的痛苦程度、DT 的数字量表以及操作人员的培训水平,工具似乎不适用。

结论

我们观察到使用 DT 和 PL 的积极结果,尽管操作人员报告了一些挑战。克服这些挑战可能会改善痛苦筛查,特别是对于经验较少的临床医生,并且进一步开发 PL 项目和 DT 量表可能有助于管理。DT 和 PL 允许临床医生指导/优先干预或转诊,尽管在痛苦筛查中持续的培训和支持至关重要。

相似文献

1
Acceptability of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List to community-based telephone cancer helpline operators, and to cancer patients and carers.基于社区的电话癌症援助热线运营商、癌症患者及其照顾者对痛苦温度计和问题清单的可接受性。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Jan 31;11:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-46.
2
Feasibility of brief psychological distress screening by a community-based telephone helpline for cancer patients and carers.通过社区电话热线对癌症患者及其照顾者进行简短心理困扰筛查的可行性。
BMC Cancer. 2010 Jan 12;10:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-14.
3
Use of the Distress Thermometer in a cancer helpline context: Can it detect changes in distress, is it acceptable to nurses and callers, and do high scores lead to internal referrals?在癌症求助热线场景中使用苦恼温度计:它能否检测苦恼程度的变化,护士和来电者是否接受它,高分是否会导致内部转诊?
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Feb;26:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Brief psychological distress screening on a cancer helpline: How nurses introduce, and callers respond to, the Distress Thermometer.癌症热线的简要心理困扰筛查:护士如何介绍,以及来电者如何回应,痛苦温度计。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Aug;53:101986. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101986. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
5
Patients' and clinicians' experiences of holistic needs assessment using a cancer distress thermometer and problem list: A qualitative study.使用癌症痛苦温度计和问题清单进行整体需求评估的患者及临床医生体验:一项定性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Aug;23:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 11.
6
Initiation of distress screening in oral cancer clinics in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡口腔癌诊所开展痛苦筛查工作。
Psychooncology. 2023 Jul;32(7):1013-1021. doi: 10.1002/pon.6098. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
7
Which items on the distress thermometer problem list are the most distressing?在苦恼温度计问题清单上,哪些项目是最令人苦恼的?
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Nov;24(11):4549-57. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3294-z. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
8
Are needs assessments cost effective in reducing distress among patients with cancer? A randomized controlled trial using the Distress Thermometer and Problem List.在降低癌症患者的痛苦方面,需求评估是否具有成本效益?使用痛苦温度计和问题清单的随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 10;31(29):3631-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.3040. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
9
Validation of the distress thermometer for caregivers of children and adolescents with schizophrenia.中文版:验证用于照料儿童和青少年精神分裂症患者的护理人员的痛苦温度计。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Feb;76(2):687-698. doi: 10.1111/jan.14233.
10
Screening of physical distress in breast cancer survivors: Concurrent validity of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List.乳腺癌幸存者身体困扰的筛查:苦恼温度计与问题清单的同时效度
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jan;28(1):e12880. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12880. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes, Knowledge and Clinical Practice of Health Professionals towards Psychological Disorders in Cancer Patients: An Observational Study.医疗专业人员对癌症患者心理障碍的态度、知识和临床实践:一项观察性研究。
Diseases. 2024 Jul 1;12(7):141. doi: 10.3390/diseases12070141.
2
The effectiveness of community-based palliative care programme components: a systematic review.社区为基础的姑息治疗方案各组成部分的效果:系统评价。
Age Ageing. 2023 Sep 1;52(9). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad175.
3
Evaluating How Mental Health Changed in Australia through the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from the '' (TTPN) Survey.评估澳大利亚在新冠大流行期间心理健康状况的变化:来自“澳大利亚全国性精神健康与福祉追踪调查”(TTPN 调查)的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 4;19(1):558. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010558.
4
Prevalence of distress and its associated factors among caregivers of people diagnosed with cancer: A cross-sectional study.癌症患者照顾者的痛苦现状及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Dec;31(23-24):3402-3413. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16167. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
5
Mapping the nature of distress raised by patients with high-grade glioma and their family caregivers: a descriptive longitudinal study.描绘高级别胶质瘤患者及其家庭照顾者所面临的困扰的本质:一项描述性纵向研究。
Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Jan;7(1):103-110. doi: 10.1093/nop/npz032. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
6
Distress screening and supportive care referrals used by telephone-based health services: a systematic review.基于电话的健康服务中使用的困扰筛查和支持性护理转介:系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2059-2069. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05252-8. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
7
I-CoPE: A pilot study of structured supportive care delivery to people with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma and their carers.I-CoPE:一项针对新诊断的高级别胶质瘤患者及其照料者提供结构化支持性护理的试点研究。
Neurooncol Pract. 2019 Jan;6(1):61-70. doi: 10.1093/nop/npy010. Epub 2018 May 19.
8
Implementing Systematic Screening and Structured Care for Distressed Callers Using Cancer Council's Telephone Services: Protocol for a Randomized Stepped-Wedge Trial.利用癌症理事会电话服务对求助者实施系统筛查和结构化护理:一项随机阶梯楔形试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 May 16;8(5):e12473. doi: 10.2196/12473.
9
Are cancer helplines effective in supporting caregivers? A systematic review.癌症援助热线在支持护理人员方面是否有效?系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Sep;27(9):3219-3231. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04807-z. Epub 2019 May 16.
10
Agreement between a single-item measure of anxiety and depression and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A cross-sectional study.单项焦虑和抑郁测量与医院焦虑和抑郁量表的一致性:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):e0210111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210111. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening cancer patients' families with the distress thermometer (DT): a validation study.使用苦恼温度计(DT)筛查癌症患者家属:一项验证性研究。
Psychooncology. 2008 Oct;17(10):959-66. doi: 10.1002/pon.1320.
2
Distress assessment: practice change through guideline implementation.痛苦评估:通过指南实施实现实践变革。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007 Dec;11(6):817-21. doi: 10.1188/07.CJON.817-821.
3
Screening for distress in cancer patients: is the distress thermometer a valid measure in the UK and does it measure change over time? A prospective validation study.癌症患者心理困扰筛查:在英国,心理困扰温度计是一种有效的测量工具吗?它能测量随时间的变化吗?一项前瞻性验证研究。
Psychooncology. 2008 Jun;17(6):538-47. doi: 10.1002/pon.1273.
4
Screening for distress in patients with brain cancer using the NCCN's rapid screening measure.使用美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)的快速筛查方法对脑癌患者的痛苦状况进行筛查。
Psychooncology. 2008 Jun;17(6):621-5. doi: 10.1002/pon.1271.
5
Distress and its correlates in Korean cancer patients: pilot use of the distress thermometer and the problem list.韩国癌症患者的痛苦及其相关因素:痛苦温度计和问题清单的初步应用
Psychooncology. 2008 Jun;17(6):548-55. doi: 10.1002/pon.1275.
6
Sensitivity and specificity of the Distress Thermometer for depression in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.新诊断乳腺癌患者中抑郁症状温度计对抑郁症的敏感性和特异性。
Psychooncology. 2008 Jun;17(6):556-60. doi: 10.1002/pon.1289.
7
Pooled results from 38 analyses of the accuracy of distress thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders.38项关于苦恼温度计及其他检测癌症相关情绪障碍的超短方法准确性分析的汇总结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 10;25(29):4670-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.0438. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
8
Distress in patients with cancer: definition, assessment, and suggested interventions.癌症患者的痛苦:定义、评估及建议的干预措施。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007 Jun;11(3):413-8. doi: 10.1188/07.CJON.413-418.
9
A review of distress and its management in couples facing end-of-life cancer.临终癌症患者伴侣的痛苦及其管理综述。
Psychooncology. 2007 Jul;16(7):603-16. doi: 10.1002/pon.1196.
10
Clinical experience with the NCCN distress thermometer in breast cancer patients.NCCN 苦恼温度计在乳腺癌患者中的临床应用经验。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007 Jan;5(1):104-11. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2007.0011.