Blom Johannes, Yin Li, Lidén Annika, Dolk Anders, Jeppsson Bengt, Påhlman Lars, Holmberg Lars, Nyrén Olof
Division of Surgery, Department for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Int J Cancer. 2008 Apr 1;122(7):1618-23. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23208.
Understanding the reasons for nonparticipation in cancer screening may give clues about how to improve compliance. However, limited cooperation has hampered research on nonparticipant profiles. We took advantage of Sweden's comprehensive demographic and health care registers to investigate characteristics of all participants and nonparticipants in a pilot program for colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy. A population-based sample of 1986 Swedish residents 59-61 years old was invited. Registers provided information on each individual's gender, country of birth, marital status, education, income, hospital contacts, place of residence, distance to screening center and cancer within the family. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), modeled with multivariable logistic regression, estimated the independent associations between each background factor and the propensity for nonparticipation after control for the effects of other factors. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Being male (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.03-1.57, relative to female), unmarried or divorced (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.23-2.30 and OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.14-1.95, respectively, relative to married) and having an income in the lowest tertile (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.27-2.23, relative to highest tertile) was associated with increased nonparticipation. Living in the countryside or in small communities and having a documented family history of colorectal cancer was associated with better participation. Distance to the screening center did not significantly affect participation, nor did recent hospital care consumption or immigrant status. To increase compliance, invitations must appeal to men, unmarried or divorced people and people with low socioeconomic status.
了解不参与癌症筛查的原因可能会为如何提高依从性提供线索。然而,有限的合作阻碍了对未参与者特征的研究。我们利用瑞典全面的人口和医疗保健登记系统,调查了一项乙状结肠镜检查结直肠癌筛查试点项目中所有参与者和未参与者的特征。邀请了1986名年龄在59 - 61岁的瑞典居民作为基于人群的样本。登记系统提供了每个人的性别、出生国家、婚姻状况、教育程度、收入、医院就诊记录、居住地点、到筛查中心的距离以及家族中的癌症情况。通过多变量逻辑回归模型得出的优势比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI),估计了在控制其他因素影响后,每个背景因素与不参与倾向之间的独立关联。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。男性(相对于女性,OR = 1.27,95% CI = 1.03 - 1.57)、未婚或离异(相对于已婚,OR分别为1.69,95% CI = 1.23 - 2.30和1.49,95% CI = 1.14 - 1.95)以及收入处于最低三分位数(相对于最高三分位数,OR = 1.68,95% CI = 1.27 - 2.23)与不参与率增加相关。居住在农村或小社区以及有记录的结直肠癌家族史与更好的参与率相关。到筛查中心的距离对参与率没有显著影响,近期的医院护理消费或移民身份也没有影响。为了提高依从性,邀请必须吸引男性、未婚或离异人士以及社会经济地位较低的人群。