• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于理解结直肠癌乙状结肠镜筛查中的不参与情况。

Toward understanding nonparticipation in sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Blom Johannes, Yin Li, Lidén Annika, Dolk Anders, Jeppsson Bengt, Påhlman Lars, Holmberg Lars, Nyrén Olof

机构信息

Division of Surgery, Department for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2008 Apr 1;122(7):1618-23. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23208.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.23208
PMID:18064580
Abstract

Understanding the reasons for nonparticipation in cancer screening may give clues about how to improve compliance. However, limited cooperation has hampered research on nonparticipant profiles. We took advantage of Sweden's comprehensive demographic and health care registers to investigate characteristics of all participants and nonparticipants in a pilot program for colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy. A population-based sample of 1986 Swedish residents 59-61 years old was invited. Registers provided information on each individual's gender, country of birth, marital status, education, income, hospital contacts, place of residence, distance to screening center and cancer within the family. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), modeled with multivariable logistic regression, estimated the independent associations between each background factor and the propensity for nonparticipation after control for the effects of other factors. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Being male (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.03-1.57, relative to female), unmarried or divorced (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.23-2.30 and OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.14-1.95, respectively, relative to married) and having an income in the lowest tertile (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.27-2.23, relative to highest tertile) was associated with increased nonparticipation. Living in the countryside or in small communities and having a documented family history of colorectal cancer was associated with better participation. Distance to the screening center did not significantly affect participation, nor did recent hospital care consumption or immigrant status. To increase compliance, invitations must appeal to men, unmarried or divorced people and people with low socioeconomic status.

摘要

了解不参与癌症筛查的原因可能会为如何提高依从性提供线索。然而,有限的合作阻碍了对未参与者特征的研究。我们利用瑞典全面的人口和医疗保健登记系统,调查了一项乙状结肠镜检查结直肠癌筛查试点项目中所有参与者和未参与者的特征。邀请了1986名年龄在59 - 61岁的瑞典居民作为基于人群的样本。登记系统提供了每个人的性别、出生国家、婚姻状况、教育程度、收入、医院就诊记录、居住地点、到筛查中心的距离以及家族中的癌症情况。通过多变量逻辑回归模型得出的优势比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI),估计了在控制其他因素影响后,每个背景因素与不参与倾向之间的独立关联。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。男性(相对于女性,OR = 1.27,95% CI = 1.03 - 1.57)、未婚或离异(相对于已婚,OR分别为1.69,95% CI = 1.23 - 2.30和1.49,95% CI = 1.14 - 1.95)以及收入处于最低三分位数(相对于最高三分位数,OR = 1.68,95% CI = 1.27 - 2.23)与不参与率增加相关。居住在农村或小社区以及有记录的结直肠癌家族史与更好的参与率相关。到筛查中心的距离对参与率没有显著影响,近期的医院护理消费或移民身份也没有影响。为了提高依从性,邀请必须吸引男性、未婚或离异人士以及社会经济地位较低的人群。

相似文献

1
Toward understanding nonparticipation in sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.关于理解结直肠癌乙状结肠镜筛查中的不参与情况。
Int J Cancer. 2008 Apr 1;122(7):1618-23. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23208.
2
A 9-year follow-up study of participants and nonparticipants in sigmoidoscopy screening: importance of self-selection.一项针对乙状结肠镜筛查参与者和非参与者的9年随访研究:自我选择的重要性。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 May;17(5):1163-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2764.
3
Trends in colorectal cancer testing among Medicare subpopulations.医疗保险亚人群中结直肠癌检测的趋势。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Sep;35(3):194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.029. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
4
Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates.结直肠癌不同筛查策略的随机试验:患者反应及检出率
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):347-57. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji050.
5
Characteristics of nonparticipants in a randomised colorectal cancer screening trial comparing sigmoidoscopy and faecal immunochemical testing.随机对照结直肠癌筛查试验中不参与者的特征比较,该试验比较乙状结肠镜检查和粪便免疫化学检测。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Aug 1;151(3):361-371. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34025. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
Reasons for non-participation in population-based abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.参与人群腹部主动脉瘤筛查的原因。
Br J Surg. 2014 Apr;101(5):481-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9434. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
7
Participation in a sigmoidoscopic colorectal cancer screening program: a pilot study.参与乙状结肠镜结直肠癌筛查项目:一项试点研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Oct;9(10):1127-30.
8
Association of marital status and colorectal cancer screening participation in the USA.美国婚姻状况与结直肠癌筛查参与情况的关联
Colorectal Dis. 2015 May;17(5):O108-14. doi: 10.1111/codi.12926.
9
Comparing different strategies for colorectal cancer screening in Italy: predictors of patients' participation.比较意大利不同结直肠癌筛查策略:患者参与的预测因素。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan;105(1):188-98. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.583. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
10
Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms according to distal colorectal findings: comparison of sigmoidoscopy-based strategies.根据远端结直肠发现评估近端进展性腺瘤的风险:乙状结肠镜检查策略的比较。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jun 19;105(12):878-86. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt117. Epub 2013 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive factors of breast cancer mammography screening among Iranian women.伊朗女性乳腺癌 X 光筛查的预测因素。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2024 Jan 1;64(4):E448-E456. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.4.3089. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Colonoscopy compliance and diagnostic yield in a large population-based colorectal cancer screening programme.结肠镜检查顺应性和在大型基于人群的结直肠癌筛查计划中的诊断收益。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Sep 13;38(1):227. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04517-3.
3
Factors associated with adherence to colonoscopy among individuals who were positive in the preliminary screening for colorectal neoplasms.
初步结直肠肿瘤筛查阳性者中与结肠镜检查依从性相关的因素。
Cancer Med. 2022 Nov;11(22):4321-4331. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4730. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
4
Psychometric properties of the SCREESCO questionnaire used in a colorectal cancer screening programme-A Rasch analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查项目的SCREESCO问卷的心理测量特性——拉施分析
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):541-550. doi: 10.1111/jep.13301. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
5
Utilization of Colorectal Cancer Screening among Saudi Elderly Population: A Study from the Saudi National Survey for Elderly Health.沙特老年人群中结直肠癌筛查的应用:来自沙特全国老年人健康调查的一项研究
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Dec 25;19(12):3401-3407. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.12.3401.
6
Are anxiety levels associated with the decision to participate in a Swedish colorectal cancer screening programme? A nationwide cross-sectional study.焦虑水平是否与参与瑞典结直肠癌筛查计划的决定有关?一项全国性的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e025109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025109.
7
Predictors of colorectal cancer screening awareness among people working in a hospital environment.医院环境中工作人员对结直肠癌筛查的认知预测因素。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30(3):315-321. doi: 10.20524/aog.2017.0127. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Decentralized colonoscopic surveillance with high patient compliance prevents hereditary and familial colorectal cancer.具有高患者依从性的分散式结肠镜监测可预防遗传性和家族性结直肠癌。
Fam Cancer. 2016 Oct;15(4):543-51. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9867-7.
9
The societal gain of medical development and innovation in gastroenterology.消化内科学领域的医学发展和创新带来的社会效益。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2013 Oct;1(5):335-45. doi: 10.1177/2050640613502337.
10
The impact of age and gender on papillary thyroid cancer survival.年龄和性别对甲状腺乳头状癌生存的影响。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jun;97(6):E878-87. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2864. Epub 2012 Apr 10.