Kastrup A, Gröschel K, Nägele T, Riecker A, Schmidt F, Schnaudigel S, Ernemann U
Department of Neurology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Mar;29(3):608-12. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0871. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
The routine use of distal filter devices during carotid angioplasty and stent placement (CAS) is controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze their effects on the incidence of new diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesions as surrogate markers for stroke in important subgroups.
DWI was performed immediately before and after CAS in 68 patients with and 175 without protection, and patients were further subdivided according to their age or symptom status.
The proportion of patients with new ipsilateral DWI lesion(s) was significantly lower after protected versus unprotected CAS (52% versus 68%), as well as in symptomatic patients (56% versus 74%) or those at or younger than 75 years of age (46% versus 67%; all P < .05). Similarly, the total number of lesions was significantly lower after protected versus unprotected CAS (median, 1; interquartile range [IQR], 0-2; versus median, 1; IQR 0-4.75) and in symptomatic patients (median, 1; IQR, 0-3; versus median, 2; IQR, 0-6) or those at or younger than 75 years of age (median, 0; IQR, 0-2; versus median, 1; IQR, 0-4; all P < .05). In contrast, for asymptomatic patients (48% versus 52%; P = .8; median, 0; IQR, 0-2; versus median, 1; IQR, 0-2.5; P = .6) or those older than 75 years of age (73% versus 69%; P = .7; median, 1; IQR, 0-4; versus median, 1.5; IQR, 0-5.75; P = .6), the proportion of patients with new lesion(s) and the total number of these lesions were not significantly different between protected and unprotected CAS.
The use of distal filter devices generally reduces the incidence of new DWI lesions; however, this beneficial effect might not necessarily pertain to older and asymptomatic patients.
在颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)期间常规使用远端滤器装置存在争议。本研究的目的是分析其对重要亚组中新发扩散加权成像(DWI)病变发生率的影响,以此作为卒中的替代标志物。
对68例使用保护装置和175例未使用保护装置的患者在CAS前后即刻进行DWI检查,并根据年龄或症状状态对患者进一步细分。
与未使用保护装置的CAS相比,使用保护装置的CAS后同侧新发DWI病变患者的比例显著降低(52%对68%),有症状患者中也是如此(56%对74%),75岁及以下患者中同样如此(46%对67%;所有P <.05)。同样,与未使用保护装置的CAS相比,使用保护装置的CAS后病变总数显著减少(中位数为1;四分位间距[IQR]为0 - 2;对中位数为1;IQR为0 - 4.75),有症状患者中也是如此(中位数为1;IQR为0 - 3;对中位数为2;IQR为0 - 6),75岁及以下患者中同样如此(中位数为0;IQR为0 - 2;对中位数为1;IQR为0 - 4;所有P <.05)。相比之下,对于无症状患者(48%对52%;P =.8;中位数为0;IQR为0 - 2;对中位数为1;IQR为0 - 2.5;P =.6)或75岁以上患者(73%对69%;P =.7;中位数为1;IQR为0 - 4;对中位数为1.5;IQR为0 - 5.75;P =.6),使用保护装置和未使用保护装置的CAS之间新发病变患者的比例和这些病变的总数无显著差异。
使用远端滤器装置通常会降低新发DWI病变的发生率;然而,这种有益效果不一定适用于老年和无症状患者。