• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米安色林与马普替林治疗门诊重度抑郁症患者疗效及安全性的对照研究。

A controlled study of the efficacy and safety of mianserin and maprotiline in outpatients with major depression.

作者信息

Möller H J, Riehl T, Dietzfelbinger T, Wernicke T

机构信息

Psychiatric Clinic, University of Bonn, Venusberg, Germany.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1991 Winter;6(3):179-92. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199100630-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00004850-199100630-00006
PMID:1806624
Abstract

Efficacy and tolerability of mianserin (60-90 mg/day) or maprotiline (100-150 mg/day) were tested in a 4-week double-blind control group study on 317 depressive outpatients. The patients had to fulfill the criteria of a major depression according to DSM-III. The study was performed by psychiatrists after special rater training. Standardized rating procedures were applied to evaluate depressive symptoms and unwanted effects at three measurement points. A significant improvement was found in both groups, without any statistical differences between mianserin and maprotiline. According to the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) 65% of the patients in both groups were judged as responders. A good tolerability of both drugs were demonstrated. With respect to anticholinergic side-effects there was a certain advantage in favor to mianserin.

摘要

在一项针对317名门诊抑郁症患者的为期4周的双盲对照组研究中,测试了米安色林(60 - 90毫克/天)或马普替林(100 - 150毫克/天)的疗效和耐受性。这些患者必须符合美国精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版(DSM - III)中重度抑郁症的标准。该研究由经过特殊评分员培训的精神科医生进行。在三个测量点采用标准化评分程序来评估抑郁症状和不良反应。两组均有显著改善,米安色林和马普替林之间无任何统计学差异。根据临床总体印象量表(CGI),两组中65%的患者被判定为有反应者。两种药物均显示出良好的耐受性。在抗胆碱能副作用方面,米安色林有一定优势。

相似文献

1
A controlled study of the efficacy and safety of mianserin and maprotiline in outpatients with major depression.米安色林与马普替林治疗门诊重度抑郁症患者疗效及安全性的对照研究。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1991 Winter;6(3):179-92. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199100630-00006.
2
A double-blind comparison of mianserin and maprotiline in depressed medically ill elderly people.米安色林与马普替林治疗老年内科疾病伴发抑郁症的双盲对照研究
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1990 Mar;81(3):289-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb06499.x.
3
A double-blind trial comparing mianserin and maprotiline in depressed inpatients.一项比较米安色林和马普替林治疗住院抑郁症患者的双盲试验。
Clin Ther. 1985;7(5):584-92.
4
Placebo-controlled trial of mianserin and maprotiline in primary depressive illness: a preliminary report.米安色林与马普替林治疗原发性抑郁症的安慰剂对照试验:初步报告。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):239S-248S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1983.tb05871.x.
5
Mianserin and maprotiline as compared to amitriptyline in severe endogenous depression. A new methodological approach to the clinical evaluation of the efficacy of antidepressants.米安色林和马普替林与阿米替林治疗重度内源性抑郁症的比较。一种评估抗抑郁药疗效的临床新方法。
Pharmacopsychiatria. 1982 Nov;15(6):197-204. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1019538.
6
Mianserin, maprotiline and intracardiac conduction.米安色林、马普替林与心内传导
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):249S-254S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1983.tb05872.x.
7
Moclobemide compared with second-generation antidepressants in elderly people.老年人群中吗氯贝胺与第二代抗抑郁药的比较。
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;360:64-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05335.x.
8
A double-blind study comparing paroxetine and maprotiline in depressed outpatients.一项比较帕罗西汀和马普替林治疗门诊抑郁症患者的双盲研究。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 1997 May;30(3):97-105. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979490.
9
Multicenter double-blind study of moclobemide and maprotiline.吗氯贝胺与马普替林的多中心双盲研究。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994;17 Suppl 1:S38-49. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199417001-00006.
10
A controlled study of mianserin in moderately to severely depressed outpatients.米安色林治疗中度至重度门诊抑郁症患者的对照研究。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1991;27(2):135-9.