Suppr超能文献

我们能否预测胶囊滞留后的自发排出?一项评估胶囊滞留发生率和临床结局的全国性研究。

Can we predict spontaneous capsule passage after retention? A nationwide study to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes of capsule retention.

作者信息

Cheon J H, Kim Y-S, Lee I-S, Chang D K, Ryu J-K, Lee K J, Moon J-S, Park C H, Kim J-O, Shim K-N, Choi C H, Cheung D Y, Jang B I, Seo G-S, Chun H-J, Choi M-G

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2007 Dec;39(12):1046-52. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966978.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Although capsule endoscopy has become a central diagnostic tool for small-bowel evaluation, retention of a capsule remains a major concern. This study attempted to investigate the incidence and clinical outcomes of capsule retention, and to determine the factors predictive of spontaneous capsule passage after retention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Through a nationwide multicenter survey, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 1291 patients who had a capsule endoscopy between February 2002 and July 2006 in Korea. Clinical and procedural characteristics and postprocedural outcomes were analyzed for the cases with capsule retention.

RESULTS

Capsule retention occurred in 2.5 % of total cases (32/1291). The major diseases accompanying capsule retention were Crohn's disease, malignant tumors, and tuberculous enterocolitis, in decreasing order. In 11 of the 32 patients (34.4 %), early surgical or endoscopic interventions were instituted for diagnosis or treatment of diseases before retention symptoms developed. The remaining 21 (65.6 %) patients initially received medical treatments. Of these, 10 (31.3 %) ultimately underwent surgical intervention due to the development of symptoms of intestinal obstruction or medical treatment failure. The other 11 (34.4 %) eventually passed the capsule. The presence of a larger lumen diameter (greater than two-thirds of the capsule diameter) at the stricture site was associated with spontaneous passage.

CONCLUSIONS

Our large-scale study suggests that retention occurs infrequently during capsule endoscopy. Moreover, a retained capsule might indicate the best intervention for the offending pathology, or it may spontaneously pass in the long run, particularly in patients with less small bowel stricture.

摘要

背景与研究目的

尽管胶囊内镜已成为小肠评估的核心诊断工具,但胶囊滞留仍是一个主要问题。本研究旨在调查胶囊滞留的发生率和临床结局,并确定滞留后胶囊自然排出的预测因素。

患者与方法

通过全国性多中心调查,我们回顾性分析了2002年2月至2006年7月在韩国接受胶囊内镜检查的1291例患者的记录。对发生胶囊滞留的病例分析其临床和操作特征以及术后结局。

结果

胶囊滞留发生率为总病例数的2.5%(32/1291)。伴随胶囊滞留的主要疾病依次为克罗恩病、恶性肿瘤和结核性小肠结肠炎。32例患者中有11例(34.4%)在出现滞留症状前因疾病诊断或治疗而早期接受了手术或内镜干预。其余21例(65.6%)患者最初接受了药物治疗。其中,10例(31.3%)因出现肠梗阻症状或药物治疗失败最终接受了手术干预。另外11例(34.4%)最终胶囊自然排出。狭窄部位管腔直径较大(大于胶囊直径的三分之二)与自然排出相关。

结论

我们的大规模研究表明,胶囊内镜检查期间胶囊滞留很少发生。此外,滞留的胶囊可能提示针对相关病变的最佳干预措施,或者从长远来看它可能自然排出,尤其是在小肠狭窄较轻的患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验