Cheon J H, Kim Y-S, Lee I-S, Chang D K, Ryu J-K, Lee K J, Moon J-S, Park C H, Kim J-O, Shim K-N, Choi C H, Cheung D Y, Jang B I, Seo G-S, Chun H-J, Choi M-G
Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Endoscopy. 2007 Dec;39(12):1046-52. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966978.
Although capsule endoscopy has become a central diagnostic tool for small-bowel evaluation, retention of a capsule remains a major concern. This study attempted to investigate the incidence and clinical outcomes of capsule retention, and to determine the factors predictive of spontaneous capsule passage after retention.
Through a nationwide multicenter survey, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 1291 patients who had a capsule endoscopy between February 2002 and July 2006 in Korea. Clinical and procedural characteristics and postprocedural outcomes were analyzed for the cases with capsule retention.
Capsule retention occurred in 2.5 % of total cases (32/1291). The major diseases accompanying capsule retention were Crohn's disease, malignant tumors, and tuberculous enterocolitis, in decreasing order. In 11 of the 32 patients (34.4 %), early surgical or endoscopic interventions were instituted for diagnosis or treatment of diseases before retention symptoms developed. The remaining 21 (65.6 %) patients initially received medical treatments. Of these, 10 (31.3 %) ultimately underwent surgical intervention due to the development of symptoms of intestinal obstruction or medical treatment failure. The other 11 (34.4 %) eventually passed the capsule. The presence of a larger lumen diameter (greater than two-thirds of the capsule diameter) at the stricture site was associated with spontaneous passage.
Our large-scale study suggests that retention occurs infrequently during capsule endoscopy. Moreover, a retained capsule might indicate the best intervention for the offending pathology, or it may spontaneously pass in the long run, particularly in patients with less small bowel stricture.
尽管胶囊内镜已成为小肠评估的核心诊断工具,但胶囊滞留仍是一个主要问题。本研究旨在调查胶囊滞留的发生率和临床结局,并确定滞留后胶囊自然排出的预测因素。
通过全国性多中心调查,我们回顾性分析了2002年2月至2006年7月在韩国接受胶囊内镜检查的1291例患者的记录。对发生胶囊滞留的病例分析其临床和操作特征以及术后结局。
胶囊滞留发生率为总病例数的2.5%(32/1291)。伴随胶囊滞留的主要疾病依次为克罗恩病、恶性肿瘤和结核性小肠结肠炎。32例患者中有11例(34.4%)在出现滞留症状前因疾病诊断或治疗而早期接受了手术或内镜干预。其余21例(65.6%)患者最初接受了药物治疗。其中,10例(31.3%)因出现肠梗阻症状或药物治疗失败最终接受了手术干预。另外11例(34.4%)最终胶囊自然排出。狭窄部位管腔直径较大(大于胶囊直径的三分之二)与自然排出相关。
我们的大规模研究表明,胶囊内镜检查期间胶囊滞留很少发生。此外,滞留的胶囊可能提示针对相关病变的最佳干预措施,或者从长远来看它可能自然排出,尤其是在小肠狭窄较轻的患者中。