四合花粉模型无法解释孟德尔豌豆（豌豆属）实验中的偏差。
The tetrad-pollen model fails to explain the bias in Mendel's pea (Pisum sativum) experiments.
作者信息
Fairbanks Daniel J, Schaalje G Bruce
机构信息
Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA.
出版信息
Genetics. 2007 Dec;177(4):2531-4. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.079970.
Abstract
For >40 years, geneticists and science historians have appealed to the tetrad-pollen model as an explanation of the bias toward expectation in Mendel's data, albeit without experimental support. Our experiments demonstrate that pollen sampling during self-pollination in pea conforms to the binomial distribution with no evidence of a tetrad-pollen effect.
摘要
四十多年来，遗传学家和科学史学家一直援引四分体花粉模型来解释孟德尔数据中偏向预期的偏差，尽管缺乏实验支持。我们的实验表明，豌豆自花授粉期间的花粉采样符合二项分布，没有四分体花粉效应的证据。
相似文献
1
The tetrad-pollen model fails to explain the bias in Mendel's pea (Pisum sativum) experiments.四合花粉模型无法解释孟德尔豌豆（豌豆属）实验中的偏差。
Genetics. 2007 Dec;177(4):2531-4. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.079970.
2
Mendel's pea crosses: varieties, traits and statistics.孟德尔的豌豆杂交实验：品种、特征和统计学。
Hereditas. 2019 Oct 31;156:33. doi: 10.1186/s41065-019-0111-y. eCollection 2019.
3
Are Mendel's Data Reliable? The Perspective of a Pea Geneticist.孟德尔的数据可靠吗？一位豌豆遗传学家的观点。
J Hered. 2016;107(7):635-646. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esw058. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
4
Mendel's controlled pollination experiments in Mirabilis jalapa confirmed his discovery of the gamete theory of inheritance in Pisum.孟德尔在马利筋属植物上进行的有控制的授粉实验证实了他在豌豆中发现的配子理论遗传。
Hereditas. 2022 Mar 26;159(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41065-022-00232-1.
5
[Research progress on the cloning of Mendel's gene in pea (Pisum sativum L.) and its application in genetics teaching].[豌豆（Pisum sativum L.）中孟德尔基因克隆的研究进展及其在遗传学教学中的应用]
Yi Chuan. 2013 Jul;35(7):931-8. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1005.2013.00931.
6
Revision of Fisher's analysis of Mendel's garden pea experiments.费希尔对孟德尔豌豆实验分析的修订
Genetics. 2004 Mar;166(3):1139-40. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1139.
7
Genetic structure of wild pea (Pisum sativum subsp. elatius) populations in the northern part of the Fertile Crescent reflects moderate cross-pollination and strong effect of geographic but not environmental distance.野生豌豆（Pisum sativum subsp. elatius）在新月沃地北部种群的遗传结构反映了适度的异花授粉和地理距离的强烈影响，但不受环境距离的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 26;13(3):e0194056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194056. eCollection 2018.
8
Mendel: From genes to genome.孟德尔：从基因到基因组。
Plant Physiol. 2022 Nov 28;190(4):2103-2114. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac424.
9
On Fisher's criticism of Mendel's results with the garden pea.论费希尔对孟德尔豌豆实验结果的批评。
Genetics. 2004 Mar;166(3):1133-6. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1133.
10
From Mendel's discovery on pea to today's plant genetics and breeding : Commemorating the 150th anniversary of the reading of Mendel's discovery.从孟德尔的豌豆杂交实验到今天的植物遗传学和育种：纪念孟德尔发现 150 周年。
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Dec;129(12):2267-2280. doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2803-2. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
引用本文的文献
1
Darwin's Influence on Mendel: Evidence from a New Translation of Mendel's Paper.达尔文对孟德尔的影响：来自孟德尔论文新译本的证据
Genetics. 2016 Oct;204(2):401-405. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.194613.
本文引用的文献
1
Mud sticks: on the alleged falsification of Mendel's data.泥污难除：论孟德尔数据的伪造之说
Genetics. 2007 Mar;175(3):975-9. doi: 10.1093/genetics/175.3.975.
2
Revision of Fisher's analysis of Mendel's garden pea experiments.费希尔对孟德尔豌豆实验分析的修订
Genetics. 2004 Mar;166(3):1139-40. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1139.
3
An alternative possibility for seed coat color determinaton in Mendel's experiment.孟德尔实验中种皮颜色决定的另一种可能性。
Genetics. 2004 Mar;166(3):1137. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1137.
4
On Fisher's criticism of Mendel's results with the garden pea.论费希尔对孟德尔豌豆实验结果的批评。
Genetics. 2004 Mar;166(3):1133-6. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1133.
5
Mendelian controversies: a botanical and historical review.孟德尔论争：植物学和历史的回顾。
Am J Bot. 2001 May;88(5):737-52.
6
Mendel's work as an introduction to genetics.
Adv Sci. 1966 Jul;23(109):120-4.
7
Are Mendel's results really too close?孟德尔的结果真的过于接近了吗？
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1986 Nov;61(4):295-312. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1986.tb00656.x.
Zotero 插件