Carrillo-Muñoz A J, Quindós G, del Valle O, Santos P, Giusiano G, Ezkurra P A, Estivill M D, Casals J B
Departamento de Microbiología, ACIA, Barcelona, Spain.
Chemotherapy. 2008;54(1):38-42. doi: 10.1159/000112414. Epub 2007 Dec 10.
In vitro activity of caspofungin and voriconazole against 184 clinical isolates of Candida and other medically important yeasts in comparison with that of fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B was determined by using a disk diffusion method (Neo-Sensitabs) standardized according to the recommendations of the CLSI documents M44-A and M44-S1 (same medium: Mueller-Hinton plus methylene blue; inoculum and minimal inhibitory concentration/zone breakpoints). Seventy-two percent of clinical isolates were susceptible to caspofungin, 23.6% showed an intermediate susceptibility (most of them were Candida parapsilosis) and 4.3% were resistant (values for Candida spp. were 71.2, 23.8 and 5%, respectively). For voriconazole, 96.7% of clinical isolates were susceptible and 3.3% were resistant (Candida spp.: 96 and 3.8%, respectively). Both caspofungin and voriconazole showed high activity against a wide variety of clinically important yeasts.
采用根据美国临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)文件M44 - A和M44 - S1的建议进行标准化的纸片扩散法(Neo - Sensitabs)(相同培养基:Mueller - Hinton加亚甲蓝;接种物和最小抑菌浓度/抑菌圈界限),测定了卡泊芬净和伏立康唑对184株念珠菌临床分离株及其他医学上重要酵母菌的体外活性,并与氟康唑、酮康唑、伊曲康唑和两性霉素B进行比较。72%的临床分离株对卡泊芬净敏感,23.6%表现为中介敏感性(其中大多数为近平滑念珠菌),4.3%耐药(念珠菌属的值分别为71.2%、23.8%和5%)。对于伏立康唑,96.7%的临床分离株敏感,3.3%耐药(念珠菌属分别为96%和3.8%)。卡泊芬净和伏立康唑对多种临床上重要的酵母菌均显示出高活性。