Pfaller M A, Diekema D J, Gibbs D L, Newell V A, Meis J F, Gould I M, Fu W, Colombo A L, Rodriguez-Noriega E
Department of Pathology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Jun;45(6):1735-45. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00409-07. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
Fluconazole in vitro susceptibility test results for 205,329 yeasts were collected from 134 study sites in 40 countries from June 1997 through December 2005. Data were collected for 147,776 yeast isolates tested with voriconazole from 2001 through 2005. All investigators tested clinical yeast isolates by the CLSI M44-A disk diffusion method. Test plates were automatically read and results recorded with a BIOMIC image analysis system. Species, drug, zone diameter, susceptibility category, and quality control results were collected quarterly. Duplicate (same patient, same species, and same susceptible-resistant biotype profile during any 7-day period) and uncontrolled test results were not analyzed. Overall, 90.1% of all Candida isolates tested were susceptible (S) to fluconazole; however, 10 of the 22 species identified exhibited decreased susceptibility (<75% S) on the order of that seen with the resistant (R) species C. glabrata and C. krusei. Among 137,487 isolates of Candida spp. tested against voriconazole, 94.8% were S and 3.1% were R. Less than 30% of fluconazole-resistant isolates of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. rugosa remained S to voriconazole. The non-Candida yeasts (8,821 isolates) were generally less susceptible to fluconazole than Candida spp. but, aside from Rhodotorula spp., remained susceptible to voriconazole. This survey demonstrates the broad spectrum of these azoles against the most common opportunistic yeast pathogens but identifies several less common yeast species with decreased susceptibility to antifungal agents. These organisms may pose a future threat to optimal antifungal therapy and emphasize the importance of prompt and accurate species identification.
1997年6月至2005年12月期间,从40个国家的134个研究地点收集了205,329株酵母菌的氟康唑体外药敏试验结果。2001年至2005年期间,收集了147,776株用伏立康唑检测的酵母菌分离株的数据。所有研究者均采用CLSI M44-A纸片扩散法检测临床酵母菌分离株。试验平板用BIOMIC图像分析系统自动读取并记录结果。每季度收集菌种、药物、抑菌圈直径、药敏类别和质量控制结果。重复试验结果(同一患者、同一菌种、在任何7天期间内相同的敏感-耐药生物型谱)和未控制的试验结果未进行分析。总体而言,所有检测的念珠菌分离株中有90.1%对氟康唑敏感(S);然而,在鉴定出的22个菌种中,有10个表现出敏感性降低(<75% S),其程度与耐药(R)菌种光滑念珠菌和克柔念珠菌相似。在137,487株针对伏立康唑检测的念珠菌属分离株中,94.8%为S,3.1%为R。白色念珠菌、光滑念珠菌、热带念珠菌和皱落念珠菌中对氟康唑耐药的分离株中,不到30%对伏立康唑仍敏感。非念珠菌酵母菌(8,821株分离株)通常比念珠菌属对氟康唑的敏感性更低,但除红酵母属外,对伏立康唑仍敏感。这项调查证明了这些唑类药物对最常见的机会性酵母菌病原体具有广谱活性,但也鉴定出了几种对抗真菌药物敏感性降低的不太常见的酵母菌菌种。这些微生物可能对最佳抗真菌治疗构成未来威胁,并强调了及时准确鉴定菌种的重要性。