Suppr超能文献

使用“实战演练”评估学生和住院医师在基本临床场景中的表现:一项令人不安的分析。

The use of "war games" to evaluate performance of students and residents in basic clinical scenarios: a disturbing analysis.

作者信息

Young Jeffrey S, Dubose Joseph E, Hedrick Traci L, Conaway Mark R, Nolley Barbara

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Cognitive Research Laboratory, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia 22906-0709, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2007 Sep;63(3):556-64. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31812e5229.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

"Failure to Rescue" is a term applied to clinical issues that, if unrecognized or improperly treated, lead to adverse outcomes. We examined the cognitive components of rescue through the use of a "War Games" simulator format. Our hypothesis was that junior and senior medical students would be less able than interns and residents to detail the actions needed to assess, intervene, and stabilize patients.

METHODS

Medical students and residents rotating on the trauma and surgical intensive care unit service participated. Twelve scenarios were created to focus on basic floor emergencies. Scores were assigned for clinical actions ordered. The scenarios were validated by two critical care attending physicians, and these scores were used as the expert group. Scores were assigned by two examiners, and the average of the grades in each area was used. The scores are a ratio of actual to possible correct responses in each section, and in the entire exercise.

RESULTS

Subjects were divided into third-year medical students (MS3), fourth-year students (MS4), first-year residents (PGY1), residents beyond their first year (PGY2+), and experts. There were 20 subjects and 5 experts (n = 85) in each group for a total of 140 simulated cases examined. On initial evaluation, MS4 and PGY2+ performed significantly worse than expert, and MS3 and PGY1 performed similarly to experts. On secondary evaluation, all groups performed significantly worse than the expert group. In determining the diagnosis, only MS3 differed significantly from the experts. On follow-up, and in total score, all performed significantly worse than the experts.

DISCUSSION

All groups had significant deficits in cognitive performance compared with experts in the areas of secondary evaluation, follow-up of the presenting problem, and total performance in simple clinical scenarios. We must design educational systems that rapidly enhance the cognitive performance of students and residents before they are left to independently diagnose and intervene in life-threatening clinical situations.

摘要

背景

“未能成功救治”是一个适用于临床问题的术语,这些问题如果未被识别或处理不当,会导致不良后果。我们通过使用“实战演练”模拟器形式来研究救治的认知组成部分。我们的假设是,低年级和高年级医学生在详细阐述评估、干预和稳定患者所需的行动方面,比实习医生和住院医生能力更差。

方法

参与创伤和外科重症监护病房服务轮转的医学生和住院医生参加了研究。创建了12个场景,重点关注基本的病房紧急情况。为所下达的临床行动打分。这些场景由两名重症监护主治医师进行验证,这些分数被用作专家组的分数。由两名考官打分,并使用每个区域分数的平均值。分数是每个部分以及整个练习中实际正确反应与可能正确反应的比率。

结果

受试者分为三年级医学生(MS3)、四年级医学生(MS4)、一年级住院医生(PGY1)、一年级以上住院医生(PGY2+)和专家。每组有20名受试者和5名专家(n = 85),共检查了140个模拟病例。在初步评估中,MS4和PGY2+的表现明显比专家差,而MS3和PGY1的表现与专家相似。在二次评估中,所有组的表现都明显比专家组差。在确定诊断方面,只有MS3与专家有显著差异。在随访和总分方面,所有人的表现都明显比专家差。

讨论

与专家相比,所有组在二次评估、当前问题的随访以及简单临床场景中的总体表现等认知能力方面都存在显著不足。我们必须设计教育系统,在学生和住院医生独立诊断和干预危及生命的临床情况之前,迅速提高他们的认知能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验