Werner Maria, Tönjes Anke, Stumvoll Michael, Thiery Joachim, Kratzsch Jürgen
Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(2):240-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.020.
The oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) is the most common method to estimate indices of insulin sensitivity in clinical as well as in epidemiological studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the variability of insulin levels for reference intervals and of insulin sensitivity indices during oGTT by three different insulin immunoassays.
Serum insulin levels were determined during oGTT of randomly selected adult subjects (total n=101, with n=68 with normal glucose tolerance) by the LIAISON (LIA), the Elecsys (EL) and the AutoDELFIA (AD) method.
Sensitivity and precision of all three insulin assays were comparable. Insulin levels demonstrated a close (p<0.001) interassay correlation (LIA vs. EL: r=0.987, LIA vs. AD: r=0.966, EL vs. AD: r=0.965). Insulin levels and insulin sensitivity indices (n=68) of the AD method were significantly different compared to the LIA or EL assay (p<0.001). Basal insulin levels demonstrated an assay-dependent significant body mass index (BMI) dependency (LIA: r=0.24, p=0.05; AD: r=0.44, p<0.001; EL: r=0.36, p<0.01) in the regression analysis. At 120 min post glucose, gender was the relevant influencing factor on insulin levels of the LIA (r=0.40, p<0.001), AD (r=0.37, p<0.01) and EL (r=0.40 p<0.001) method.
We conclude that assay-dependent reference intervals should be used for the clinical interpretation of insulin levels from oGTT and of insulin sensitivity indices. Moreover, BMI and gender have to be considered as influencing factors.
口服葡萄糖耐量试验(oGTT)是临床及流行病学研究中评估胰岛素敏感性指标最常用的方法。本研究旨在通过三种不同的胰岛素免疫测定法,研究口服葡萄糖耐量试验期间胰岛素水平参考区间及胰岛素敏感性指标的变异性。
采用LIAISON(LIA)法、Elecsys(EL)法和AutoDELFIA(AD)法,对随机选取的成年受试者(共101例,其中68例葡萄糖耐量正常)进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验,测定血清胰岛素水平。
三种胰岛素测定法的灵敏度和精密度相当。胰岛素水平显示出紧密的(p<0.001)测定间相关性(LIA与EL:r=0.987,LIA与AD:r=0.966,EL与AD:r=0.965)。与LIA或EL测定法相比,AD法的胰岛素水平和胰岛素敏感性指标(n=68)有显著差异(p<0.001)。在回归分析中,基础胰岛素水平显示出与测定方法相关的显著体重指数(BMI)依赖性(LIA:r=0.24,p=0.05;AD:r=0.44,p<0.001;EL:r=0.36,p<0.01)。在葡萄糖注射后120分钟,性别是LIA(r=0.40,p<0.001)、AD(r=0.37,p<0.01)和EL(r=0.40,p<0.001)法胰岛素水平的相关影响因素。
我们得出结论,对于口服葡萄糖耐量试验中胰岛素水平及胰岛素敏感性指标的临床解读,应使用与测定方法相关的参考区间。此外,BMI和性别必须被视为影响因素。