Rynders Corey A, Weltman Judy Y, Malin Steven K, Jiang Boyi, Breton Marc, Barrett Eugene J, Weltman Arthur
1Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO; 2Exercise Physiology Core Laboratory, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; 3Department of Kinesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; 4Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; and 5Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jan;48(1):66-72. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000728.
This study aims to establish whether changes in indices of insulin sensitivity (Si) derived from fasting glucose and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) are comparable to Si determined by the oral minimal model (OMM) in response to acute moderate-intensity exercise (MIE) and high-intensity exercise (HIE).
Eighteen prediabetic subjects completed three conditions: control (no exercise), ∼ 200 kcal of MIE (∼ 50% of VO2peak), and ∼ 200 kcal of HIE (∼ 80% VO2peak). One hour postexercise (or control), subjects underwent a 75-g OGTT; plasma glucose and insulin were measured to determine Si using several OGTT-based indices (OMM, Belfiore index, Cederholm index, Matsuda index, Gutt index, oral glucose insulin sensitivity index, Stumvoll metabolic clearance rate, Stumvoll insulin sensitivity index, 1/mean OGTT insulin, and 1/insulin incremental area under the curve) and fasting indices (1/homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, 1/adipose tissue insulin resistance, 40/fasting insulin, and Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index). ANOVA and Pearson's correlations were used to examine relationships between changes in Si (ΔSi) among various indices compared to the OMM.
Exercise resulted in a significant increase in Si, according to OGTT-based indices ranging from 11% to 51% (MIE, P < 0.04) and from 8% to 85% (HIE, P < 0.05). Fasting indices showed no change in response to MIE (P > 0.29) and a decrease in Si following HIE (P < 0.001). OGTT-based and fasting indices underpredicted ΔSi-OMM by ∼ 40% and ∼ 90% following MIE and HIE, respectively. ΔSi-OMM following MIE was moderately correlated with ΔSi estimated by OGTT-based indices, but not fasting indices. In contrast, ΔSi-OMM following HIE was not significantly correlated with any Si index.
Insulin sensitivity increases postexercise, according to most Si models. However, there is high variability between indices under each condition, and these measures only correlate with the OMM following MIE. Caution should be exerted when drawing conclusions about the insulin-sensitizing effects of exercise based on OGTT and fasting indices.
本研究旨在确定由空腹血糖和口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)得出的胰岛素敏感性指数(Si)的变化,与通过口服最小模型(OMM)测定的Si相比,在急性中等强度运动(MIE)和高强度运动(HIE)后的变化是否具有可比性。
18名糖尿病前期受试者完成了三种情况:对照(不运动)、约200千卡的MIE(约为最大摄氧量峰值的50%)和约200千卡的HIE(约为最大摄氧量峰值的80%)。运动后(或对照)1小时,受试者进行75克OGTT;测量血浆葡萄糖和胰岛素,使用几种基于OGTT的指数(OMM、贝廖雷指数、塞德霍尔姆指数、松田指数、古特指数、口服葡萄糖胰岛素敏感性指数、斯图姆沃尔代谢清除率、斯图姆沃尔胰岛素敏感性指数、1/平均OGTT胰岛素和1/胰岛素曲线下增量面积)和空腹指数(1/胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估、1/脂肪组织胰岛素抵抗、40/空腹胰岛素和定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数)来确定Si。使用方差分析和皮尔逊相关性分析来检查与OMM相比,各种指数之间Si变化(ΔSi)的关系。
根据基于OGTT的指数,运动导致Si显著增加,MIE增加幅度为11%至51%(P<0.04),HIE增加幅度为8%至85%(P<0.05)。空腹指数显示,MIE后无变化(P>0.29),HIE后Si降低(P<0.001)。基于OGTT的指数和空腹指数分别在MIE和HIE后,对ΔSi-OMM的预测低估了约40%和约90%。MIE后的ΔSi-OMM与基于OGTT的指数估计的ΔSi中度相关,但与空腹指数不相关。相比之下,HIE后的ΔSi-OMM与任何Si指数均无显著相关性。
根据大多数Si模型,运动后胰岛素敏感性增加。然而,每种情况下指数之间存在很大差异,并且这些指标仅在MIE后与OMM相关。基于OGTT和空腹指数得出关于运动对胰岛素增敏作用的结论时应谨慎。