Goldthorpe John H, Jackson Michelle
Nuffield College, Oxford.
Br J Sociol. 2007 Dec;58(4):525-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00165.x.
In Britain in recent years social mobility has become a topic of central political concern, primarily as a result of the effort made by New Labour to make equality of opportunity rather than equality of condition a focus of policy. Questions of the level, pattern and trend of mobility thus bear directly on the relevance of New Labour's policy analysis, and in turn are likely be crucial to the evaluation of its performance in government. However, politically motivated discussion of social mobility often reveals an inadequate grasp of both empirical and analytical issues. We provide new evidence relevant to the assessment of social mobility - in particular, intergenerational class mobility - in contemporary Britain through cross-cohort analyses based on the NCDS and BCS datasets which we can relate to earlier cross-sectional analyses based on the GHS. We find that, contrary to what seems now widely supposed, there is no evidence that absolute mobility rates are falling; but, for men, the balance of upward and downward movement is becoming less favourable. This is overwhelmingly the result of class structural change. Relative mobility rates, for both men and women, remain essentially constant, although there are possible indications of a declining propensity for long-range mobility. We conclude that under present day structural conditions there can be no return to the generally rising rates of upward mobility that characterized the middle decades of the twentieth century - unless this is achieved through changing relative rates in the direction of greater equality or, that is, of greater fluidity. But this would then produce rising rates of downward mobility to exactly the same extent - an outcome apparently unappreciated by, and unlikely to be congenial to, politicians preoccupied with winning the electoral 'middle ground'.
近年来在英国,社会流动性已成为政治核心关注话题,这主要是新工党努力将机会平等而非条件平等作为政策重点的结果。因此,流动性的水平、模式和趋势问题直接关系到新工党政策分析的相关性,进而可能对评估其执政表现至关重要。然而,出于政治目的对社会流动性的讨论往往显示出对实证和分析问题的理解不足。我们通过基于全国儿童发展研究(NCDS)和英国住户调查(BCS)数据集的跨队列分析,提供了与当代英国社会流动性评估相关的新证据——特别是代际阶层流动性——我们可以将其与基于综合住户调查(GHS)的早期横断面分析联系起来。我们发现,与目前似乎广泛认为的情况相反,没有证据表明绝对流动率在下降;但是,对于男性来说,向上和向下流动的平衡变得不那么有利了。这主要是阶级结构变化的结果。男性和女性的相对流动率基本保持不变,尽管可能有迹象表明远距离流动的倾向在下降。我们得出结论,在当前的结构条件下,不可能恢复到20世纪中叶普遍上升的向上流动率——除非通过朝着更大平等或更大流动性的方向改变相对比率来实现。但这将导致向下流动率在相同程度上上升——这一结果显然未被专注于赢得选举“中间地带”的政治家所认识,也不太可能受到他们的欢迎。