Baum Nancy M, Gollust Sarah E, Goold Susan D, Jacobson Peter D
Department of Health Management and Policy at the University of Michigan School of Public Health in Ann Arbor, USA.
J Law Med Ethics. 2007 Winter;35(4):657-67, 513. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00188.x.
Ethical challenges in public health can have a significant impact on the health of communities if they impede efficiencies and best practices. Competing needs for resources and a plurality of values can challenge public health policymakers and practitioners to make fair and effective decisions for their communities. In this paper, the authors offer an analytic framework designed to assist policymakers and practitioners in managing the ethical tensions they face in daily practice. Their framework is built upon the following set of six considerations: determining population-level utility of the proposed action; demonstrating evidence of need and effectiveness of actions; establishing fairness of goals and proposed implementation strategies; ensuring accountability; and, assessing expected efficiencies and costs associated with the proposed action. Together, these considerations create a structured guide to assist decision-makers in identifying potential ethical challenges and in assessing the moral considerations that underlie public health practice - and possibly even, if the conditions are met, reduce the creation of ethical tension. Although the authors'empirical experiences provide the basis for the framework advanced here, their approach remains to be tested and evaluated by public health practitioners.
如果公共卫生中的伦理挑战阻碍了效率和最佳实践,那么它们可能会对社区健康产生重大影响。对资源的竞争需求和多元价值观可能会促使公共卫生政策制定者和从业者为其社区做出公平有效的决策。在本文中,作者提供了一个分析框架,旨在帮助政策制定者和从业者应对他们在日常实践中面临的伦理困境。他们的框架基于以下六个方面的考量:确定拟采取行动的人群层面的效用;证明行动的必要性和有效性;确立目标和拟实施策略的公平性;确保问责制;评估与拟采取行动相关的预期效率和成本。这些考量共同构成了一个结构化指南,以帮助决策者识别潜在的伦理挑战,并评估公共卫生实践背后的道德考量——甚至在条件满足的情况下,有可能减少伦理困境的产生。尽管作者的实证经验为这里提出的框架提供了基础,但他们的方法仍有待公共卫生从业者进行测试和评估。