Wain R A, Tuhrim S, D'Autrechy L, Reggia J A
Montefiore Medical Center.
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:94-8.
Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States and a major source of morbidity. [1] Recent studies have shown a potential use for thrombolytic agents in the treatment of ischemic stroke (IS) but these agents are contraindicated in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). A computed tomographic scan is used to distinguish between these two stroke types prior to the use of thrombolytic agents, but may not be readily obtainable. Decision making aids such as algorithms developed at Guy's Hospital and Strong Memorial Hospital have been designed in an attempt to make this distinction on clinical grounds. We have constructed computerized medical decision-making (CMD) systems based upon these algorithms and compared their performance to a system we developed with the use of National Stroke Data Bank data. Relevant medical data for each of 337 patient cases in the Mount Sinai Hospital Stroke Data Bank were presented to each of the CMD systems. In consideration of the clinical task of using thrombolytic agents, we attempted to maximize the positive predictive value (PPV) for ischemic stroke. The CMD systems based upon the Guy's Hospital and Mount Sinai algorithms produced PPV's of 95% and 94% with sensitivities of 77% and 78% respectively compared to a PPV of 93% and sensitivity of 56% with the Strong Memorial CMD system. The Mount Sinai CMD system was judged more efficacious than the Guy's Hospital system in that it required less clinical information that could be more easily obtained to arrive at similar results.
中风是美国第三大死因和主要发病原因。[1] 最近的研究表明,溶栓剂在缺血性中风(IS)治疗中有潜在用途,但这些药物在脑出血(ICH)中是禁忌的。在使用溶栓剂之前,计算机断层扫描用于区分这两种中风类型,但可能无法轻易获得。诸如盖伊医院和斯特朗纪念医院开发的算法等决策辅助工具已被设计出来,试图基于临床依据进行这种区分。我们基于这些算法构建了计算机化医疗决策(CMD)系统,并将其性能与我们利用国家中风数据库数据开发的系统进行了比较。西奈山医院中风数据库中337例患者病例的相关医疗数据被呈现给每个CMD系统。考虑到使用溶栓剂的临床任务,我们试图最大化缺血性中风的阳性预测值(PPV)。基于盖伊医院和西奈山算法的CMD系统产生的PPV分别为95%和94%,敏感性分别为77%和78%,而斯特朗纪念CMD系统的PPV为93%,敏感性为56%。西奈山CMD系统被认为比盖伊医院系统更有效,因为它需要更少且更容易获得的临床信息就能得出类似结果。