Suppr超能文献

诱导型erm(A)和erm(C)金黄色葡萄球菌基因之间克林霉素耐药突变体选择潜力的差异。

Differences in potential for selection of clindamycin-resistant mutants between inducible erm(A) and erm(C) Staphylococcus aureus genes.

作者信息

Daurel Claire, Huet Corinne, Dhalluin Anne, Bes Michèle, Etienne Jerome, Leclercq Roland

机构信息

Service de Microbiologie, CHU Côte de Nacre, 14033 Caen cedex, France.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Feb;46(2):546-50. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01925-07. Epub 2007 Dec 12.

Abstract

In staphylococci, inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLS(B)) resistance is conferred by the erm(C) or erm(A) gene. This phenotype is characterized by the erythromycin-clindamycin "D-zone" test. Although clindamycin appears active in vitro, exposure of MLS(B)-inducible Staphylococcus aureus to this antibiotic may result in the selection of clindamycin-resistant mutants, either in vitro or in vivo. We have compared the frequencies of mutation to clindamycin resistance for 28 isolates of S. aureus inducibly resistant to erythromycin and bearing the erm(C) (n = 18) or erm(A) (n = 10) gene. Seven isolates susceptible to erythromycin or bearing the msr(A) gene (efflux) were used as controls. The frequencies of mutation to clindamycin resistance for the erm(A) isolates (mean +/- standard deviation, 3.4 x 10(-8) +/- 2.4 x 10(-8)) were only slightly higher than those for the controls (1.1 x 10(-8) +/- 6.4 x 10(-9)). By contrast, erm(C) isolates displayed a mean frequency of mutation to clindamycin resistance (4.7 x 10(-7) +/- 5.5 x 10(-7)) 14-fold higher than that of the S. aureus isolates with erm(A). The difference was also observed, although to a lower extent, when erm(C) and erm(A) were cloned into S. aureus RN4220. We conclude that erm(C) and erm(A) have different genetic potentials for selection of clindamycin-resistant mutants. By the disk diffusion method, erm(C) and erm(A) isolates could be distinguished on the basis of high- and low-level resistance to oleandomycin, respectively.

摘要

在葡萄球菌中,诱导型大环内酯-林可酰胺-链阳菌素B(MLS(B))耐药性由erm(C)或erm(A)基因介导。这种表型的特征是红霉素-克林霉素“D区”试验。尽管克林霉素在体外似乎有活性,但将MLS(B)诱导型金黄色葡萄球菌暴露于这种抗生素可能会在体外或体内导致克林霉素耐药突变体的产生。我们比较了28株对红霉素诱导耐药且携带erm(C)(n = 18)或erm(A)(n = 10)基因的金黄色葡萄球菌对克林霉素耐药的突变频率。7株对红霉素敏感或携带msr(A)基因(外排)的菌株用作对照。erm(A)菌株对克林霉素耐药的突变频率(平均值±标准差,3.4×10⁻⁸±2.4×10⁻⁸)仅略高于对照(1.1×10⁻⁸±6.4×10⁻⁹)。相比之下,erm(C)菌株对克林霉素耐药的平均突变频率(4.7×10⁻⁷±5.5×10⁻⁷)比携带erm(A)的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株高14倍。当将erm(C)和erm(A)克隆到金黄色葡萄球菌RN4220中时,也观察到了这种差异,尽管程度较低。我们得出结论,erm(C)和erm(A)在选择克林霉素耐药突变体方面具有不同的遗传潜力。通过纸片扩散法,可以分别根据对竹桃霉素的高水平和低水平耐药性来区分erm(C)和erm(A)菌株。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Mechanisms of Resistance to Macrolide Antibiotics among .……中对大环内酯类抗生素的耐药机制
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Nov 17;10(11):1406. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111406.
4
Pediatric Methicillin-Resistant Osteoarticular Infections.儿童耐甲氧西林骨与关节感染
Microorganisms. 2018 May 4;6(2):40. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms6020040.
9
An approach to identifying drug resistance associated mutations in bacterial strains.一种鉴定细菌株耐药相关突变的方法。
BMC Genomics. 2012;13 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-S7-S23. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验