Bishop Justin A, Chase Nancy, Magill Shelley S, Kurtzman Cletus P, Fiandaca Mark J, Merz William G
Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21112, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Feb;46(2):443-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01986-07. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
Molecular taxonomic studies have revealed new Candida species among phenotypically delineated species, the best example being Candida dubliniensis. This study was designed to determine the occurrence of two new molecularly defined species, Candida bracarensis and Candida nivariensis, which are closely related to and identified as Candida glabrata by phenotypic assays. A total of 137 recent clinical isolates of C. glabrata identified by phenotypic characteristics was tested with C. bracarensis and C. nivariensis species-specific peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization probes. Three of 137 (2.2%) isolates were positive with the C. bracarensis probe, whereas the control strain, but none of the clinical isolates, was positive with the C. nivariensis probe. D1/D2 sequencing confirmed the identification of the three isolates as representing C. bracarensis. Clinically, one C. bracarensis isolate was recovered from a presumed infection, a polymicrobial pelvic abscess in a patient with perforated diverticulitis. The other two isolates were recovered from two adult oncology patients who were only colonized. C. bracarensis was white on CHROMagar Candida, had variable API-20C patterns that overlapped with C. nivariensis and some C. glabrata isolates, and had variable results with a rapid trehalose assay. Interestingly, an isolate from one of the colonized oncology patients was resistant to fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole in vitro. In summary, C. bracarensis was detected among clinical isolates of C. glabrata, while C. nivariensis was not. One C. bracarensis isolate causing a presumed deep infection was recovered, and another isolate was azole resistant. Whether clinical laboratories should identify C. bracarensis will require more data.
分子分类学研究在表型界定的物种中发现了新的念珠菌物种,最典型的例子是都柏林念珠菌。本研究旨在确定两种新的分子定义物种——布拉加念珠菌和尼瓦里念珠菌的出现情况,这两种菌与光滑念珠菌密切相关,且通过表型分析被鉴定为光滑念珠菌。对总共137株近期通过表型特征鉴定的光滑念珠菌临床分离株,使用布拉加念珠菌和尼瓦里念珠菌物种特异性肽核酸荧光原位杂交探针进行检测。137株分离株中有3株(2.2%)对布拉加念珠菌探针呈阳性反应,而对照菌株对尼瓦里念珠菌探针呈阳性反应,但临床分离株均无阳性反应。D1/D2测序证实这3株分离株鉴定为布拉加念珠菌。临床上,1株布拉加念珠菌分离株来自1例疑似感染患者,该患者为患有穿孔性憩室炎的多微生物盆腔脓肿患者。另外2株分离株来自2例仅为定植的成年肿瘤患者。布拉加念珠菌在CHROMagar念珠菌显色培养基上呈白色,其API-20C模式多变,与尼瓦里念珠菌和一些光滑念珠菌分离株重叠,快速海藻糖试验结果也多变。有趣的是,1例定植肿瘤患者的分离株在体外对氟康唑、伊曲康唑、伏立康唑和泊沙康唑耐药。总之,在光滑念珠菌临床分离株中检测到了布拉加念珠菌,而未检测到尼瓦里念珠菌。分离出1株导致疑似深部感染的布拉加念珠菌,另一株分离株对唑类耐药。临床实验室是否应鉴定布拉加念珠菌还需要更多数据。