Suppr超能文献

样本匹配中的学习策略:鸽子的“如果-那么”与构型学习

Learning strategies in matching to sample: if-then and configural learning by pigeons.

作者信息

Katz Jeffrey S, Bodily Kent D, Wright Anthony A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2008 Feb;77(2):223-30. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.10.011. Epub 2007 Nov 9.

Abstract

Pigeons learned a matching-to-sample task with a split training-set design in which half of the stimulus displays were untrained and tested following acquisition. Transfer to the untrained displays along with no novel-stimulus transfer indicated that these pigeons learned the task (partially) via if-then rules. Comparisons to other performance measures indicated that they also partially learned the task via configural learning (learning the gestalt of the whole stimulus display). Differences in the FR-sample requirement (1 vs. 20) had no systematic effect on the type of learning or level of learning obtained. Differences from a previous study [Wright, A.A., 1997. Concept learning and learning strategies. Psychol. Sci. 8, 119-123] are discussed, including the effect of displaying the stimuli vertically (traditional display orientation) or horizontally from the floor.

摘要

鸽子通过一种分割训练集设计学习了匹配样本任务,其中一半的刺激显示在习得后未经过训练并进行测试。向未训练的显示进行迁移以及没有新刺激迁移表明,这些鸽子(部分地)通过“如果-那么”规则学习了该任务。与其他性能指标的比较表明,它们也通过构型学习(学习整个刺激显示的格式塔)部分地学习了该任务。固定比率样本要求(1对20)的差异对所获得的学习类型或学习水平没有系统性影响。讨论了与先前一项研究[赖特,A.A.,1997年。概念学习和学习策略。《心理科学》8,119 - 123]的差异,包括垂直(传统显示方向)或从地面水平显示刺激的影响。

相似文献

1
Learning strategies in matching to sample: if-then and configural learning by pigeons.
Behav Processes. 2008 Feb;77(2):223-30. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.10.011. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
3
Flexible learning of matching and mismatching by pigeons.
Behav Processes. 2022 Sep;201:104715. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104715. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
4
Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Oct;23(4):417-33. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.23.4.417.
5
The oddity preference effect and the concept of difference in pigeons.
Learn Behav. 2016 Dec;44(4):320-328. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0219-0.
6
Degree of representation of the matching concept in pigeons (Columba livia).
J Comp Psychol. 2003 Sep;117(3):246-56. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.246.
7
Pigeons discriminate continuous versus discontinuous line segments.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jul;33(3):273-86. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.3.273.
9
Abstract-concept learning of difference in pigeons.
Anim Cogn. 2015 Jul;18(4):831-7. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0849-1. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual Discrimination Task in Guppies Using a Simultaneous Matching-to-Sample Procedure.
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;15(13):1936. doi: 10.3390/ani15131936.
2
Paper wasps form abstract concept of 'same and different'.
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Jul 27;289(1979):20221156. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1156. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
3
Modeling the Synchronization of Multimodal Perceptions as a Basis for the Emergence of Deterministic Behaviors.
Front Neurorobot. 2020 Dec 3;14:570358. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.570358. eCollection 2020.
4
Symbolic Modeling of Asynchronous Neural Dynamics Reveals Potential Synchronous Roots for the Emergence of Awareness.
Front Comput Neurosci. 2019 Feb 12;13:1. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00001. eCollection 2019.
5
The oddity preference effect and the concept of difference in pigeons.
Learn Behav. 2016 Dec;44(4):320-328. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0219-0.
6
Temporal dynamics of task switching and abstract-concept learning in pigeons.
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 2;6:1334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01334. eCollection 2015.
7
Feature- versus rule-based generalization in rats, pigeons and humans.
Anim Cogn. 2015 Nov;18(6):1267-84. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0895-8. Epub 2015 Jul 19.
8
European starlings unriddle the ambiguous-cue problem.
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 26;5:944. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00944. eCollection 2014.
9
Matching- and nonmatching-to-sample concept learning in rats using olfactory stimuli.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Sep;96(2):139-54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-139.
10
Domain is a moving target for relational learning.
Behav Processes. 2010 Feb;83(2):172-5. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.12.006. Epub 2009 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Issues in the Comparative Cognition of Abstract-Concept Learning.
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2007 Jan 1;2:79-92. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2008.20005.
2
Matching-to-sample abstract-concept learning by pigeons.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jan;34(1):178-84. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.178.
3
Matching and oddity relational learning by pigeons (Columba livia): transfer from color to shape.
Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):67-74. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0087-2. Epub 2007 May 22.
4
Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):565-601. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-565.
5
Transfer of matching-to-sample in pigeons.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Mar;21(2):199-213. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-199.
6
Identity matching-to-sample with olfactory stimuli in rats.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Mar;85(2):203-21. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.111-04.
7
Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jan;32(1):80-6. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.80.
8
Learning processes in matching and oddity: the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Oct;31(4):425-32. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.425.
9
Are theories of learning necessary?
Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193-216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367.
10
Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4(3):281-4. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-281.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验