• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Matching- and nonmatching-to-sample concept learning in rats using olfactory stimuli.利用嗅觉刺激进行大鼠的匹配和非匹配样本概念学习。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Sep;96(2):139-54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-139.
2
Successive odor matching- and non-matching-to-sample in rats: A reversal design.大鼠连续气味匹配与非匹配样本任务:一种反转设计。
Behav Processes. 2018 Oct;155:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
3
Generalized identity in a successive matching-to-sample procedure in rats: Effects of number of exemplars and a masking stimulus.大鼠连续匹配样本程序中的广义同一性:范例数量和掩蔽刺激的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Nov;110(3):366-379. doi: 10.1002/jeab.483.
4
Generalized, cross-modal, and incrementing non-matching-to-sample in rats.大鼠的广义、跨模态和递增式非匹配样本任务
Learn Behav. 2023 Mar;51(1):88-107. doi: 10.3758/s13420-023-00571-7. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
5
Emergent identity but not symmetry following successive olfactory discrimination training in rats.大鼠连续嗅觉辨别训练后出现的是新特征而非对称性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Sep;104(2):133-45. doi: 10.1002/jeab.169.
6
Identity matching-to-sample with olfactory stimuli in rats.大鼠中嗅觉刺激的样本匹配识别。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Mar;85(2):203-21. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.111-04.
7
Concurrent identity training is not necessary for associative symmetry in successive matching.对于连续匹配中的联想对称性,同时进行身份训练并非必要。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):10-25. doi: 10.1002/jeab.51. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
8
Effects of set size on identity and oddity abstract-concept learning in rats.集合大小对大鼠身份和奇异性抽象概念学习的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Sep;22(5):733-742. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01270-5. Epub 2019 May 30.
9
The oddity preference effect and the concept of difference in pigeons.鸽子的奇特偏好效应与差异概念
Learn Behav. 2016 Dec;44(4):320-328. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0219-0.
10
Pigeons learn two matching tasks, two nonmatching tasks, or one of each.鸽子学习两项匹配任务、两项不匹配任务,或各学习一项。
Learn Behav. 2023 Jun;51(2):191-200. doi: 10.3758/s13420-022-00530-8. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Generalized, cross-modal, and incrementing non-matching-to-sample in rats.大鼠的广义、跨模态和递增式非匹配样本任务
Learn Behav. 2023 Mar;51(1):88-107. doi: 10.3758/s13420-023-00571-7. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
2
Successive odor matching- and non-matching-to-sample in rats: A reversal design.大鼠连续气味匹配与非匹配样本任务:一种反转设计。
Behav Processes. 2018 Oct;155:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
3
Olfactory Stimulus Control and the Behavioral Pharmacology of Remembering.嗅觉刺激控制与记忆的行为药理学
Behav Anal (Wash D C). 2016 Nov;16(4):169-178. doi: 10.1037/bar0000033. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
4
Emergent identity but not symmetry following successive olfactory discrimination training in rats.大鼠连续嗅觉辨别训练后出现的是新特征而非对称性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Sep;104(2):133-45. doi: 10.1002/jeab.169.
5
The Magic Number 70 (plus or minus 20): Variables Determining Performance in the Rodent Odor Span Task.神奇数字70(加减20):决定啮齿动物气味跨度任务表现的变量
Learn Motiv. 2013 Aug 1;44(3):143-158. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2013.03.001.

本文引用的文献

1
Stimulus control topography coherence theory: foundations and extensions.刺激控制地形连贯性理论:基础与拓展
Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;26(2):195-213. doi: 10.1007/BF03392076.
2
Effects of dizocilpine (MK801) on olfactory span in rats.MK801(地卓西平)对大鼠嗅觉跨度的影响。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011 Jan;95(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
3
Issues in the Comparative Cognition of Abstract-Concept Learning.抽象概念学习的比较认知中的问题。
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2007 Jan 1;2:79-92. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2008.20005.
4
Differential outcomes facilitate same/different concept learning.差异结果促进相同/不同概念学习。
Anim Cogn. 2010 May;13(3):583-9. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0292-2. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
5
Differential outcomes enhance accuracy of delayed matching to sample but not resistance to change.差异结果提高了延迟匹配样本的准确性,但没有提高对变化的抵抗力。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jan;35(1):74-91. doi: 10.1037/a0012926.
6
Matching-to-sample abstract-concept learning by pigeons.鸽子的抽象概念学习匹配样本实验
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jan;34(1):178-84. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.178.
7
Learning strategies in matching to sample: if-then and configural learning by pigeons.样本匹配中的学习策略:鸽子的“如果-那么”与构型学习
Behav Processes. 2008 Feb;77(2):223-30. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.10.011. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
8
Matching-to-sample Performance In Rats: A Case Of Mistaken Identity?大鼠的匹配样本表现:认错身份的案例?
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-27.
9
Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis.鸽子的复杂学习和信息处理:批判性分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):565-601. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-565.
10
Identity matching-to-sample with olfactory stimuli in rats.大鼠中嗅觉刺激的样本匹配识别。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Mar;85(2):203-21. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.111-04.

利用嗅觉刺激进行大鼠的匹配和非匹配样本概念学习。

Matching- and nonmatching-to-sample concept learning in rats using olfactory stimuli.

机构信息

University of North Carolina Wilmington, NC 28403, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Sep;96(2):139-54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-139.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.2011.96-139
PMID:21909161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3168884/
Abstract

Previous research has shown that rats can learn matching-to-sample relations with olfactory stimuli; however, the specific characteristics of this relational control are unclear. In Experiment 1, 6 rats were trained to either match or nonmatch to sample in a modified operant chamber using common household spices as olfactory stimuli. After matching or nonmatching training with 10 exemplars, the contingencies were reversed with five new stimuli such that subjects trained on matching were shifted to nonmatching and vice versa. Following these reversed contingencies, the effects of the original training persisted for many trials with new exemplars. In Experiment 2, 9 rats were trained with matching procedures in an arena that provided for 18 different spatial locations for comparison stimuli. Five subjects were trained with differential reinforcement outcomes and 4 with only one type of reinforcer. Differential outcomes and multiple exemplars facilitated learning, and there was strong evidence for generalization to new stimuli for most rats that acquired several conditional discriminations. Performances with novel samples were generally above chance, but rarely reached the high levels obtained during baseline with well-trained stimulus relations. However, taken together, the data from the two experiments extend previous work, show that rats can learn both match and nonmatch relations with different experimental protocols, and demonstrate generalization to novel sample stimuli.

摘要

先前的研究表明,老鼠可以通过嗅觉刺激来学习匹配样本关系;然而,这种关系控制的具体特征尚不清楚。在实验 1 中,6 只老鼠在一个改良的操作性室中接受训练,使用常见的家用香料作为嗅觉刺激,进行匹配或不匹配的样本训练。在使用 10 个样本进行匹配或不匹配训练后,用 5 个新的刺激物反转了这些条件,使得接受匹配训练的老鼠转变为不匹配,反之亦然。在这些反转的条件之后,原始训练的效果在许多新样本的试验中持续存在。在实验 2 中,9 只老鼠在一个提供 18 个不同空间位置供比较刺激物的竞技场中接受匹配程序的训练。其中 5 只老鼠接受不同的强化结果,4 只老鼠只接受一种强化物。不同的结果和多个样本促进了学习,并且大多数获得了几个条件辨别能力的老鼠都有强烈的证据表明对新刺激物进行了泛化。对新样本的表现通常高于随机水平,但很少达到在基线时使用训练有素的刺激关系所获得的高水平。然而,总的来说,两项实验的数据扩展了以前的工作,表明老鼠可以使用不同的实验方案学习匹配和不匹配关系,并证明了对新样本刺激的泛化。