Suppr超能文献

与每日2.4克(400毫克片剂)相比,每日4.8克(800毫克片剂)的缓释口服美沙拉嗪用于治疗轻度至中度活动性溃疡性结肠炎:ASCEND I试验。

Delayed-release oral mesalamine 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablets) compared to 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablets) for the treatment of mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis: The ASCEND I trial.

作者信息

Hanauer S B, Sandborn W J, Dallaire C, Archambault A, Yacyshyn B, Yeh C, Smith-Hall N

机构信息

University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol. 2007 Dec;21(12):827-34. doi: 10.1155/2007/862917.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delayed-release oral mesalamine 2.4 g/day to 4.8 g/day has been shown to be effective in treating mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC), but it is unknown whether an initial dose of 4.8 g/day is more effective than 2.4 g/day in patients with mildly to moderately active UC and in the subgroup with moderate disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A six-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial assessing the safety and clinical efficacy of a new dose (ASCEND I) of medication randomly assigned 301 adults with mildly to moderately active UC to delayed-release oral mesalamine 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet [n=154]) or 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet [n=147]). The primary efficacy end point was overall improvement (ie, treatment success), defined as complete remission or response to therapy from baseline to week 6. Primary safety end points were adverse events and laboratory evaluations. Data were also analyzed separately for the prespecified subgroup of patients with moderate UC at baseline.

RESULTS

Treatment success was not statistically different between the treatment groups at week 6; 51% of the group (77 of 150) who received delayed-release oral mesalamine 2.4 g/day and 56% of the group (76 of 136) who received 4.8 g/day reached the efficacy end point (P=0.441). Among the moderate disease subgroup, however, the higher initial dose was more effective; 57% of patients (53 of 93) given delayed-release oral mesalamine 2.4 g/day and 72% of patients (55 of 76) given 4.8 g/day achieved treatment success (P=0.0384). Both regimens were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed-release oral mesalamine is an effective and well-tolerated initial therapy in patients with mildly to moderately active UC, and a 4.8 g/day dose may enhance treatment success rates in patients with moderate disease compared with mesalamine 2.4 g/day.

摘要

背景

已证明,每日口服2.4克至4.8克的缓释美沙拉嗪对轻至中度活动性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)有效,但对于轻至中度活动性UC患者以及中度疾病亚组患者,初始剂量4.8克/天是否比2.4克/天更有效尚不清楚。

患者与方法

一项为期六周的多中心、随机、双盲、对照试验(评估一种新剂量药物的安全性和临床疗效,即ASCEND I)将301例轻至中度活动性UC成人随机分为每日口服2.4克缓释美沙拉嗪组(400毫克片剂[n = 154])或4.克/天组(800毫克片剂[n = 147])。主要疗效终点为总体改善(即治疗成功),定义为从基线到第6周完全缓解或对治疗有反应。主要安全终点为不良事件和实验室评估。还对基线时中度UC患者的预先指定亚组进行了单独分析。

结果

第6周时,治疗组之间的治疗成功率无统计学差异;每日接受2.4克缓释美沙拉嗪组的51%(150例中的77例)和接受4.8克/天组的56%(136例中的76例)达到疗效终点(P = 0.441)。然而,在中度疾病亚组中,较高的初始剂量更有效;每日给予2.4克缓释美沙拉嗪的患者中有57%(93例中的53例)和给予4.8克/天的患者中有72%(76例中的55例)实现了治疗成功(P = 0.0384)。两种治疗方案耐受性均良好。

结论

缓释口服美沙拉嗪是轻至中度活动性UC患者有效且耐受性良好的初始治疗方法,与2.4克/天的美沙拉嗪相比,4.8克/天的剂量可能提高中度疾病患者的治疗成功率。

相似文献

2
Delayed-release oral mesalamine 4.8 g/day (800-mg tablet) is effective for patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis.
Gastroenterology. 2009 Dec;137(6):1934-43.e1-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.069. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
5
Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD000543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000543.pub3.
6
Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 21;4(4):CD000543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000543.pub4.
9
Oral delayed-release mesalazine: a review of its use in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.
Drugs. 1999 Mar;57(3):383-408. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957030-00013.
10
High- and low-dose oral delayed-release mesalamine in children with mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Dec;59(6):767-72. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000530.

引用本文的文献

2
The aminosalicylate - folate connection.
Drug Metab Rev. 2024 Feb;56(1):80-96. doi: 10.1080/03602532.2024.2303507. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
Use of Novel Biological Agent in Severe Ulcerative Colitis with Poor Response to Initial Therapy: A Case Report.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 Sep 1;60(253):825-827. doi: 10.31729/jnma.7590.
6
A review of the therapeutic management of ulcerative colitis.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 29;15:17562848221138160. doi: 10.1177/17562848221138160. eCollection 2022.
7
Definition of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis in clinical trials: A systematic literature review.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 Oct;10(8):854-867. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12283. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
8
Factors associated with the persistence of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid monotherapy in ulcerative colitis: a nationwide Norwegian cohort study.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 28;14:17562848211021760. doi: 10.1177/17562848211021760. eCollection 2021.
9
First United Arab Emirates consensus on diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases: A 2020 Delphi consensus.
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov 21;26(43):6710-6769. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i43.6710.
10
Key Strategies to Optimize Outcomes in Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis.
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 8;9(9):2905. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092905.

本文引用的文献

1
The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada: a population-based study.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jul;101(7):1559-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00603.x.
3
Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults.
Gut. 2004 Sep;53 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):V1-16. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.043372.
5
Satisfaction with medication: an overview of conceptual, methodologic, and regulatory issues.
Value Health. 2004 Mar-Apr;7(2):204-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.72252.x.
8
10
Oral mesalamine (Asacol) for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. A multicenter study.
Ann Intern Med. 1991 Sep 1;115(5):350-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-5-350.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验