• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型医疗集团中推动糖尿病护理改善的因素:十年进展

Factors driving diabetes care improvement in a large medical group: ten years of progress.

作者信息

Sperl-Hillen JoAnn M, O'Connor Patrick J

机构信息

HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2005 Aug;11(5 Suppl):S177-85.

PMID:16111440
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to document trends in diabetes quality of care and coinciding strategies for quality improvement over 10 years in a large medical group. Adults with diagnosed diabetes mellitus were identified each year from 1994 (N = 5610) to 2003 (N = 7650), and internal medical group data quantified improvement trends. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors that did and did not contribute to improvement trends. Median glycosylated hemoglobin A1C (A1C) levels improved from 8.3% in 1994 to 6.9% in 2003 (P <.001). Mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol measurements improved from 132 mg/dL in 1995 to 97 mg/dL in 2003 (P <.001). Both A1C (P <.01) and LDL improvement (P <.0001) were driven by drug intensification, leadership commitment to diabetes improvement, greater continuity of primary care, participation in local and national diabetes care improvement initiatives, and allocation of multidisciplinary resources at the clinic level to improve diabetes care. Resources were spent on nurse and dietitian educators, active outreach to high-risk patients facilitated by registries, physician opinion leader activities including clinic-based training programs, and financial incentives to primary care clinics. Use of endocrinology referrals was stable throughout the period at about 10% of patients per year, and there were no disease management contracts to outside vendors over the study period. Electronic medical records did not favorably affect glycemic control or lipid control in this setting. This primary care-based system achieved A1C and LDL reductions sufficient to reduce macrovascular and microvascular risk by about 50% according to landmark studies; further risk reduction should be attainable through better blood pressure control. Strategies for diabetes improvement need to be customized to address documented gaps in quality of care, provider prescribing behaviors, and patient characteristics.

摘要

本研究旨在记录一个大型医疗集团10年间糖尿病护理质量的趋势以及同时期的质量改进策略。从1994年(N = 5610)到2003年(N = 7650),每年识别出诊断为糖尿病的成年患者,并利用内科医疗集团的数据量化改进趋势。采用多变量分析来确定有助于和无助于改进趋势的因素。糖化血红蛋白A1C(A1C)的中位数水平从1994年的8.3%降至2003年的6.9%(P <.001)。平均低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇测量值从1995年的132 mg/dL降至2003年的97 mg/dL(P <.001)。A1C(P <.01)和LDL的改善(P <.0001)均由药物强化、领导层对糖尿病改善的承诺、初级护理的更高连续性、参与地方和全国糖尿病护理改善倡议以及在诊所层面分配多学科资源以改善糖尿病护理所推动。资源用于护士和营养师教育、通过登记册对高危患者进行积极外展、包括基于诊所的培训项目在内的医生意见领袖活动以及对初级护理诊所的经济激励。在内分泌科转诊的使用在整个期间稳定在每年约10%的患者,并且在研究期间没有与外部供应商签订疾病管理合同。在这种情况下,电子病历对血糖控制或血脂控制没有产生有利影响。根据标志性研究,这个基于初级护理的系统实现了A1C和LDL的降低,足以将大血管和微血管风险降低约50%;通过更好地控制血压应可进一步降低风险。糖尿病改善策略需要量身定制,以解决在护理质量、提供者处方行为和患者特征方面记录在案的差距。

相似文献

1
Factors driving diabetes care improvement in a large medical group: ten years of progress.大型医疗集团中推动糖尿病护理改善的因素:十年进展
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Aug;11(5 Suppl):S177-85.
2
Quality of outpatient care for diabetes mellitus in a national electronic health record network.国家电子健康记录网络中糖尿病门诊护理的质量
Am J Med Qual. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):13-7. doi: 10.1177/1062860605283883.
3
Model-based simulation to explore the cost-effectiveness of following practice guidelines for triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control among patients with diabetes mellitus and mixed dyslipidemia.基于模型的模拟,以探讨遵循糖尿病和混合性血脂异常患者甘油三酯和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇控制实践指南的成本效益。
Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):862-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.015.
4
Electronic patient registries improve diabetes care and clinical outcomes in rural community health centers.电子患者登记系统改善了农村社区卫生中心的糖尿病护理及临床疗效。
J Rural Health. 2009 Winter;25(1):77-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00202.x.
5
Provider organization performance assessment utilizing diabetes physician recognition program.利用糖尿病医生认可计划对医疗服务提供机构进行绩效评估。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Feb;15(2):132-6.
6
Quality of diabetes care in the community: a cross-sectional study in central Israel.以色列中部社区糖尿病护理质量:一项横断面研究
Isr Med Assoc J. 2005 Oct;7(10):643-7.
7
[Prevalence of diabetes, antidiabetic treatment and chronic diabetic complications reported by general practitioners].[全科医生报告的糖尿病患病率、抗糖尿病治疗及慢性糖尿病并发症情况]
Przegl Lek. 2005;62(4):201-5.
8
Improving organisational systems for diabetes care in Australian Indigenous communities.改善澳大利亚原住民社区糖尿病护理的组织系统。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 May 6;7:67. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-67.
9
Lowering LDL cholesterol in adults: a prospective, community-based practice initiative.降低成人低密度脂蛋白胆固醇:一项基于社区的前瞻性实践倡议。
Am J Med. 2008 Jul;121(7):604-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.02.031. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
10
Delivery of multifactorial interventions by nurse and dietitian teams in a community setting to prevent diabetic complications: a quality-improvement report.护士和营养师团队在社区环境中提供多因素干预措施以预防糖尿病并发症:一份质量改进报告。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Mar;51(3):425-34. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.11.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of inpatient distribution amongst different medical alliances in a county: a longitudinal study on a healthcare reform in rural China.不同医疗联盟在一个县的住院分布比较:中国农村医疗卫生改革的纵向研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Aug 20;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01260-x.
2
Relevant patient characteristics for guiding tailored integrated diabetes primary care: a systematic review.指导定制化综合糖尿病初级保健的相关患者特征:一项系统综述
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Sep;19(5):424-447. doi: 10.1017/S146342361800004X. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
3
Supporting Practices to Adopt Registry-Based Care (SPARC): protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
采用基于注册的护理的支持性实践(SPARC):一项随机对照试验的方案
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 9;10:46. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0232-2.
4
Differences in the Cardiometabolic Control in Type 2 Diabetes according to Gender and the Presence of Cardiovascular Disease: Results from the eControl Study.根据性别和心血管疾病的存在情况评估 2 型糖尿病的心脏代谢控制的差异:eControl 研究的结果。
Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:131709. doi: 10.1155/2014/131709. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
5
Educating resident physicians using virtual case-based simulation improves diabetes management: a randomized controlled trial.使用虚拟病例模拟对住院医师进行培训可改善糖尿病管理:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Med. 2014 Dec;89(12):1664-73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000406.
6
Factors associated with knowledge of diabetes in patients with type 2 diabetes using the Diabetes Knowledge Test validated with Rasch analysis.使用经拉施分析验证的糖尿病知识测试,探讨2型糖尿病患者糖尿病知识的相关因素。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 3;8(12):e80593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080593. eCollection 2013.
7
Is the quality of data in an electronic medical record sufficient for assessing the quality of primary care?电子病历中的数据质量是否足以评估初级保健质量?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):692-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001479. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
8
Control of glycemia and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care in Catalonia (Spain).在西班牙加泰罗尼亚的基层医疗中对 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制和心血管风险因素的管理。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):774-9. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1679. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
9
A longitudinal study examining adherence to guidelines in diabetes care according to different definitions of adequacy and timeliness.一项纵向研究,根据不同的充分性和及时性定义,检查糖尿病护理中对指南的依从性。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024278. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
10
Protocol for the ADDITION-Plus study: a randomised controlled trial of an individually-tailored behaviour change intervention among people with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes under intensive UK general practice care.ADDITION-Plus 研究方案:在英国普通医疗实践中对近期诊断为 2 型糖尿病且接受强化治疗的人群进行个体化行为改变干预的随机对照试验
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 4;11:211. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-211.