Griffore Robert J
Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1030, USA.
Am Psychol. 2007 Dec;62(9):1081-2. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.9.1081.
In an article based on her presentation to the 114th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Janet Helms described a concept of test fairness. Helms's approach to fairness appears to be based on the premise that socialization consists of experiences received from one's environment, which are simply internalized as personal attributes. From an ecological perspective, this is incorrect, misleading, and oddly evocative of social-cognitive and psychodynamic notions. Individuals are not passive recipients of culture, and they do not necessarily simply reflect their experiences. Although Helms intended her model to apply to racial and cultural groups, it seems that she has overlooked the potential of applying her concept of fairness to another important level of social organization: the family. R. J. Griffore suggests that it is unfair to avoid using valid tests that are said to be unfair because of racially or culturally based construct-irrelevant variance if those tests can help individuals make decisions that lead to success outcomes. The use of race or culture as a variable that in any way jeopardizes the prediction of success for individuals or groups is unfair for all groups for whom the test is used.
在一篇基于珍妮特·赫尔姆斯在美国心理学会第114届年会上发言的文章中,她阐述了一种考试公平性的概念。赫尔姆斯对于公平性的探讨似乎基于这样一个前提:社会化由个人从其所处环境中获得的经历构成,这些经历被简单地内化为个人特质。从生态学角度来看,这种观点是错误的、具有误导性的,并且奇怪地让人联想到社会认知和心理动力学的概念。个体并非文化的被动接受者,他们也不一定只是简单地反映自身经历。尽管赫尔姆斯希望她的模型适用于种族和文化群体,但她似乎忽略了将其公平性概念应用于另一个重要社会组织层面的潜力:家庭。R. J. 格里福尔指出,如果某些所谓因基于种族或文化的与构念无关的方差而被认为不公平的有效测试,能够帮助个体做出导向成功结果的决策,那么避免使用这些测试是不公平的。将种族或文化用作以任何方式危及个体或群体成功预测的变量,对于所有使用该测试的群体来说都是不公平的。