• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Racial groups and test fairness, considering history and construct validity.

作者信息

Newman Daniel A, Hanges Paul J, Outtz James L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4235, USA.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2007 Dec;62(9):1082-3. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.9.1082.

DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.62.9.1082
PMID:18085863
Abstract

According to Helms, "test fairness" is defined as "removal from test scores of systematic variance attributable to experiences of racial or cultural socialization." Some of Helms's reasoning is based on earlier work, which recommended that racial group or category variables be replaced entirely with individual-level constructs, to reflect racial socialization experiences that vary within racial groups. Treatment of the test fairness issue--a social and political issue--will benefit from explicitly considering historical events that contributed to group-level race differences. In light of this history, D. A. Newman et al suggest (a) retaining a group-level conceptualization of race/racial socialization and also (b) focusing on criterion-irrelevant variance in test scores that is attributable to race.

摘要

相似文献

1
Racial groups and test fairness, considering history and construct validity.
Am Psychol. 2007 Dec;62(9):1082-3. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.9.1082.
2
Implementing fairness in racial-group assessment requires assessment of individuals.在种族群体评估中实现公平需要对个体进行评估。
Am Psychol. 2007 Dec;62(9):1083-5. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.9.1083.
3
Fairness is not validity or cultural bias in racial-group assessment: a quantitative perspective.公平并非种族群体评估中的效度或文化偏见:一种量化视角。
Am Psychol. 2006 Nov;61(8):845-859. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.845.
4
Speaking of fairness in testing.说到测试中的公平性。
Am Psychol. 2007 Dec;62(9):1081-2. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.9.1081.
5
Sensation seeking: a commentary.寻求刺激:一篇评论
Addiction. 2007 Oct;102 Suppl 2:92-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01959.x.
6
Cultural processes in parenting and youth outcomes: examining a model of racial-ethnic socialization and identity in diverse populations.养育子女过程中的文化因素与青少年成长结果:审视不同人群中的种族-民族社会化与身份认同模型。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2009 Apr;15(2):106-11. doi: 10.1037/a0015510.
7
Incremental validity principles in test construction.测验编制中的增效效度原理。
Psychol Assess. 2003 Dec;15(4):467-77. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.467.
8
Dr. Janet E. Helms: Envisioning and creating a more humane psychological science, theory, and practice.珍妮特·E·赫尔姆斯博士:构想并创建更具人文关怀的心理科学、理论及实践。
Am Psychol. 2023 May-Jun;78(4):401-412. doi: 10.1037/amp0001037.
9
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
10
Racial/ethnic differences in weight-related teasing in adolescents.青少年中与体重相关的取笑行为的种族/民族差异。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Nov;16 Suppl 2:S3-10. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.445.

引用本文的文献

1
Anxiety Disorders in Caucasian and African American Children: A Comparison of Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Process Variables, and Treatment Outcomes.白种人和非裔美国儿童的焦虑症:临床特征、治疗过程变量及治疗结果的比较
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015 Oct;46(5):643-55. doi: 10.1007/s10578-014-0507-x.