Suppr超能文献

使用脉冲多普勒超声测量速度和剪切率的准确性:信号分析技术的比较

Accuracy of velocity and shear rate measurements using pulsed Doppler ultrasound: a comparison of signal analysis techniques.

作者信息

Markou C P, Ku D N

机构信息

School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta 30332-0405.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 1991;17(8):803-14. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(91)90163-q.

Abstract

An experimental investigation was instituted to evaluate the performance of Doppler ultrasound signal processing techniques for measuring fluid velocity under well-defined flow conditions using a 10-MHz multigated pulsed ultrasound instrument. Conditions of fully developed flow in a rigid, circular tube were varied over a Reynolds number range between 500 and 8000. The velocity across the tube was determined using analog and digital zero crossing detectors and three digital spectrum estimators. Determination of the Doppler frequency from analog or digital zero crossing detectors gave accurate velocity values for laminar and moderately turbulent flow away from the wall (0.969 less than or equal to r less than or equal to 0.986). Three digital spectrum estimators, Fast Fourier Transform, Burg autoregressive method, and minimum variance method, were slightly more accurate than the zero crossing detector (0.984 less than or equal to r less than or equal to 0.994), especially at points close to the walls and with higher levels of turbulence. Steep velocity gradients and transit-time-effects from high velocities produced significantly larger errors in velocity measurement. Wall shear rate estimates were most precise when calculated using the position of the wall and two velocity points. The calculated wall shears were within 20%-30% of theoretically predicted values.

摘要

开展了一项实验研究,以评估使用10兆赫多门控脉冲超声仪器在明确的流动条件下测量流体速度的多普勒超声信号处理技术的性能。在刚性圆形管道中充分发展流动的条件在雷诺数范围500至8000之间变化。使用模拟和数字过零检测器以及三种数字频谱估计器来确定管道横截面上的速度。通过模拟或数字过零检测器确定多普勒频率,对于远离管壁的层流和中度湍流(0.969≤r≤0.986)可给出准确的速度值。三种数字频谱估计器,即快速傅里叶变换、Burg自回归方法和最小方差方法,比过零检测器稍准确一些(0.984≤r≤0.994),特别是在靠近管壁处和湍流程度较高时。陡峭的速度梯度和高速产生的渡越时间效应在速度测量中产生了明显更大的误差。当使用管壁位置和两个速度点进行计算时,壁面剪切速率估计最为精确。计算得到的壁面剪切力在理论预测值的20%至30%范围内。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验