Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022 Mar;48(3):437-449. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.10.010. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
Blood flow velocity and wall shear stress (WSS) influence and are influenced by vascular disease. Their measurement is consequently useful in the laboratory and clinic. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound image velocimetry (UIV) can estimate them accurately but the need to inject contrast agents limits utility. Singular value decomposition and high-frame-rate imaging may render contrast agents dispensable. Here we determined whether contrast agent-free UIV can measure flow and WSS. In simulation, accurate measurements were achieved with a signal-to-noise ratio of 13.5 dB or higher. Signal intensity in the rabbit aorta increased monotonically with mechanical index; it was lowest during stagnant flow and uneven across the vessel. In vivo measurements with contrast-free and contrast-enhanced UIV differed by 4.4% and 1.9% for velocity magnitude and angle and by 9.47% for WSS. Bland-Altman analysis of waveforms revealed good agreement between contrast-free and contrast-enhanced UIV. In five rabbits, the root-mean-square errors were as low as 0.022 m/s (0.81%) and 0.11 Pa (1.7%). This study indicates that with an optimised protocol, UIV can assess flow and WSS without contrast agents. Unlike contrast-enhanced UIV, contrast-free UIV could be routinely employed.
血流速度和壁切应力(WSS)会影响血管疾病,也会受到血管疾病的影响。因此,它们的测量在实验室和临床中都很有用。对比增强超声血流速度(UIV)可以准确地估计它们,但需要注射造影剂限制了其应用。奇异值分解和高帧率成像可能使造影剂变得可有可无。在这里,我们确定了无造影剂的 UIV 是否可以测量血流和 WSS。在模拟中,当信噪比达到 13.5dB 或更高时,可以实现准确的测量。兔主动脉的信号强度随机械指数单调增加;在停滞流和血管不均匀处最低。与无对比剂和对比增强 UIV 的体内测量相比,速度幅度和角度相差 4.4%和 1.9%,WSS 相差 9.47%。对比剂和无对比剂 UIV 的波形 Bland-Altman 分析显示出良好的一致性。在五只兔子中,均方根误差低至 0.022m/s(0.81%)和 0.11Pa(1.7%)。这项研究表明,通过优化方案,UIV 可以在不使用造影剂的情况下评估血流和 WSS。与对比增强 UIV 不同,无对比剂的 UIV 可以常规使用。