• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院医疗质量:信息技术重要吗?信息技术应用与医疗质量之间的关系。

Hospital quality of care: does information technology matter? The relationship between information technology adoption and quality of care.

作者信息

Menachemi Nir, Chukmaitov Askar, Saunders Charles, Brooks Robert G

机构信息

Center on Patient Safety, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Jan-Mar;33(1):51-9. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000304497.89684.36.

DOI:10.1097/01.HMR.0000304497.89684.36
PMID:18091444
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitals have been slow to adopt information technology (IT) largely because of a lack of generalizable evidence of the value associated with such adoption.

PURPOSE

To explore the relationship between IT adoption and quality of care in acute-care hospitals.

METHODS

Primary data on hospital IT adoption were combined with secondary hospital discharge data. Regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between various measures of IT adoption and several quality indicators after controlling for confounders. Adoption of IT was measured using a previously validated method that considers clinical, administrative, and strategic IT capabilities of acute-care hospitals. Quality measures included the Inpatient Quality Indicators developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

RESULTS

Data from 98 hospitals were available for analyses. Hospitals adopted an average of 11.3 (45.2%) clinical IT applications, 15.7 (74.8%) administrative IT applications, and 5 (50%) strategic IT applications. In multivariate regression analyses, hospitals that adopted a greater number of IT applications were significantly more likely to have desirable quality outcomes on seven Inpatient Quality Indicator measures, including risk-adjusted mortality from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and acute myocardial infarction. An increase in clinical IT applications was also inversely correlated with utilization of incidental appendectomy, and an increase in the adoption of strategic IT applications was inversely correlated with risk-adjusted mortality from craniotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Hospital adoption of IT is associated with desirable quality outcomes across hospitals in Florida. These findings will assist hospital leaders interested in understanding better the effect of costly IT adoption on quality of care in their institutions.

摘要

背景

医院在采用信息技术(IT)方面进展缓慢,主要原因是缺乏与这种采用相关价值的可推广证据。

目的

探讨急症医院采用IT与医疗质量之间的关系。

方法

将医院IT采用的原始数据与医院出院二级数据相结合。在控制混杂因素后,使用回归分析来检验IT采用的各种衡量指标与几个质量指标之间的关系。IT采用情况通过一种先前验证的方法进行衡量,该方法考虑了急症医院的临床、行政和战略IT能力。质量指标包括医疗保健研究与质量局制定的住院患者质量指标。

结果

有98家医院的数据可用于分析。医院平均采用了11.3种(45.2%)临床IT应用程序、15.7种(74.8%)行政IT应用程序和5种(50%)战略IT应用程序。在多变量回归分析中,采用更多IT应用程序的医院在七种住院患者质量指标衡量方面显著更有可能获得理想的质量结果,包括经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术、胃肠道出血和急性心肌梗死的风险调整死亡率。临床IT应用程序的增加也与阑尾切除术的使用率呈负相关,战略IT应用程序采用率的增加与开颅手术和腹腔镜胆囊切除术的风险调整死亡率呈负相关。

实践意义

佛罗里达州各医院采用IT与理想的质量结果相关。这些发现将有助于有兴趣更好地了解采用成本高昂的IT对其机构医疗质量影响的医院领导者。

相似文献

1
Hospital quality of care: does information technology matter? The relationship between information technology adoption and quality of care.医院医疗质量:信息技术重要吗?信息技术应用与医疗质量之间的关系。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Jan-Mar;33(1):51-9. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000304497.89684.36.
2
The relationship between pediatric volume and information technology adoption in hospitals.医院儿科规模与信息技术应用之间的关系。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2007 Apr-Jun;16(2):146-52. doi: 10.1097/01.QMH.0000267452.85994.db.
3
Hospital adoption of information technologies and improved patient safety: a study of 98 hospitals in Florida.医院采用信息技术与改善患者安全:对佛罗里达州98家医院的一项研究
J Healthc Manag. 2007 Nov-Dec;52(6):398-409; discussion 410.
4
The effect of payer mix on the adoption of information technologies by hospitals.支付方组合对医院采用信息技术的影响。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2007 Apr-Jun;32(2):102-10. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000267787.71567.3f.
5
Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.入院时存在指标对医院质量评估的影响:医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)住院患者质量指标的经验
Med Care. 2008 Feb;46(2):112-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318158aed6.
6
Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.替代性绩效薪酬评分方法:对质量改进和患者结局的影响。
Med Care. 2009 Oct;47(10):1062-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a7e54c.
7
Hospital computing and the costs and quality of care: a national study.医院计算与医疗成本和质量:一项全国性研究。
Am J Med. 2010 Jan;123(1):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
8
Hospital information technology and positive financial performance: a different approach to finding an ROI.医院信息技术与积极的财务绩效:一种寻找投资回报率的不同方法。
J Healthc Manag. 2006 Jan-Feb;51(1):40-58; discussion 58-9.
9
Hospital computerized provider order entry adoption and quality: An examination of the United States.医院计算机化医嘱录入的采用和质量:对美国的考察。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2011 Jan-Mar;36(1):86-94. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181c8b1e5.
10
Association of a clinical knowledge support system with improved patient safety, reduced complications and shorter length of stay among Medicare beneficiaries in acute care hospitals in the United States.美国急性护理医院中,临床知识支持系统与医疗保险受益人的患者安全改善、并发症减少及住院时间缩短之间的关联。
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Nov;77(11):745-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital health capacity and pediatric care quality in LMICs: A large-scale analysis of 5311 health facilities.低收入和中等收入国家的数字健康能力与儿科护理质量:对5311个医疗机构的大规模分析。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 11;11:20552076251349890. doi: 10.1177/20552076251349890. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Quality of Care in Hospitals and the Use of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Applications: An Exploratory Study Using National Hospital Evaluation Data.医院护理质量与基于移动设备的个人健康记录应用:一项使用国家医院评估数据的探索性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 23;12(11):1064. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12111064.
3
Perioperative Risk Assessment of Patients Using the MyRISK Digital Score Completed Before the Preanesthetic Consultation: Prospective Observational Study.
术前咨询前使用MyRISK数字评分对患者进行围手术期风险评估:前瞻性观察研究
JMIR Perioper Med. 2023 Jan 16;6:e39044. doi: 10.2196/39044.
4
Factors of quality of care and their association with smartphone based PHR adoption in South Korean hospitals.医疗照护质量因素及其与韩国医院采用基于智能手机的个人健康记录的关联。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01666-9.
5
Factors affecting the use of clinical practice guidelines by hospital physicians: the interplay of IT infrastructure and physician attitudes.影响医院医生使用临床实践指南的因素:信息技术基础设施和医生态度的相互作用。
Implement Sci. 2020 Nov 25;15(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01056-1.
6
Analysis of Platforms and Functions of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Systems.基于移动设备的个人健康记录系统的平台与功能分析
Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Oct;26(4):311-320. doi: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.4.311. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
7
Impact of Patient Census and Admission Mortality on Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Attending Electronic Health Record Activity: A Preliminary Study.患者人数和入院死亡率对儿科重症监护病房主治电子病历活动的影响:一项初步研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Mar;11(2):226-234. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705108. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
8
Does hospital information technology infrastructure promote the implementation of clinical practice guidelines? A multicentre observational study of Japanese hospitals.医院信息技术基础设施是否促进临床实践指南的实施?一项对日本医院的多中心观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e024700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024700.
9
Hospital heterogeneity: what drives the quality of health care.医院异质性:影响医疗质量的因素。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Apr;19(3):385-408. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0891-9. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
10
Meaningful Use and Hospital Performance on Post-Acute Utilization Indicators.有意义的使用和医院在康复利用指标上的表现。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):803-823. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12677. Epub 2017 Mar 2.