• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗照护质量因素及其与韩国医院采用基于智能手机的个人健康记录的关联。

Factors of quality of care and their association with smartphone based PHR adoption in South Korean hospitals.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, 2 Busandaehak-ro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan, 46241, Republic of Korea.

HIRA Research Institute, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), 60 Hyeoksin-ro, HIRA building 9th floor, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, 26465, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01666-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-021-01666-9
PMID:34715863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8555279/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare organizations have begun to adopt personal health records (PHR) systems to engage patients, but little is known about factors associated with the adoption of PHR systems at an organizational level. The objective of this study is to investigate factors associated with healthcare organizations' adoption of PHR systems in South Korea.

METHODS

The units of analysis were hospitals with more than 100 beds. Study data of 313 hospitals were collected from May 1 to June 30, 2020. The PHR adoption status for each hospital was collected from PHR vendors and online searches. Adoption was then confirmed by downloading the hospital's PHR app and the PHR app was examined to ascertain its available functions. One major outcome variable was PHR adoption status at hospital level. Data were analysed by logistic regressions using SAS 9.4 version.

RESULTS

Out of 313 hospitals, 103 (32.9%) hospitals adopted PHR systems. The nurse-patient ratio was significantly associated with PHR adoption (OR 0.758; 0.624 to 0.920, p = 0.005). The number of health information management staff was associated with PHR adoption (OR 1.622; 1.228 to 2.141, p = 0.001). The number of CTs was positively associated with PHR adoption (OR 5.346; 1.962 to 14.568, p = 0.001). Among the hospital characteristics, the number of beds was significantly related with PHR adoption in the model of standard of nursing care (OR 1.003; 1.001 to 1.005, p < 0.001), HIM staff (OR 1.004; 1.002 to 1.006, p < 0.001), and technological infrastructure (OR 1.050; 1.003 to 1.006, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of study hospitals had adopted PHR systems. Standard of nursing care as well as information technology infrastructure in terms of human resources for health information management and advanced technologies were significantly associated with adoption of PHR systems. A favourable environment for adopting new technologies in general may be associated with the adoption and use of PHR systems.

摘要

背景

医疗机构已开始采用个人健康记录 (PHR) 系统来参与患者,但对于组织层面上与 PHR 系统采用相关的因素知之甚少。本研究旨在调查韩国医疗机构采用 PHR 系统的相关因素。

方法

分析单位为床位超过 100 张的医院。2020 年 5 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日,从 PHR 供应商和在线搜索中收集了 313 家医院的研究数据。通过下载医院的 PHR 应用程序来确认每家医院的 PHR 采用情况,并检查 PHR 应用程序以确定其可用功能。主要结果变量是医院层面的 PHR 采用情况。使用 SAS 9.4 版本通过逻辑回归进行数据分析。

结果

在 313 家医院中,有 103 家(32.9%)医院采用了 PHR 系统。护士与患者的比例与 PHR 的采用显著相关(OR 0.758;0.624 至 0.920,p=0.005)。卫生信息管理员工人数与 PHR 的采用相关(OR 1.622;1.228 至 2.141,p=0.001)。CT 数量与 PHR 的采用呈正相关(OR 5.346;1.962 至 14.568,p=0.001)。在医院特征中,在护理标准(OR 1.003;1.001 至 1.005,p<0.001)、卫生信息管理员工(OR 1.004;1.002 至 1.006,p<0.001)和技术基础设施(OR 1.050;1.003 至 1.006,p<0.001)模型中,床位数量与 PHR 的采用显著相关。

结论

三分之一的研究医院已经采用了 PHR 系统。护理标准以及人力资源管理和先进技术方面的信息技术基础设施与 PHR 系统的采用显著相关。一般来说,有利于采用新技术的环境可能与 PHR 系统的采用和使用有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/8555279/bac9747f6787/12911_2021_1666_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/8555279/bac9747f6787/12911_2021_1666_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/8555279/bac9747f6787/12911_2021_1666_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors of quality of care and their association with smartphone based PHR adoption in South Korean hospitals.医疗照护质量因素及其与韩国医院采用基于智能手机的个人健康记录的关联。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01666-9.
2
Analysis of Platforms and Functions of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Systems.基于移动设备的个人健康记录系统的平台与功能分析
Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Oct;26(4):311-320. doi: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.4.311. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
3
Factors associated with the download and use of mobile personal health record applications in Korean hospitals.韩国医院中与移动个人健康记录应用程序下载和使用相关的因素。
Health Informatics J. 2023 Jul-Sep;29(3):14604582231196955. doi: 10.1177/14604582231196955.
4
Personal Health Record Use in the United States: Forecasting Future Adoption Levels.美国个人健康记录的使用情况:预测未来的采用水平。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 30;18(3):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4973.
5
Factors influencing consumer adoption of USB-based Personal Health Records in Taiwan.影响台湾消费者采用基于 USB 的个人健康记录的因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 27;12:277. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-277.
6
Consumer Adoption of Personal Health Record Systems: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective.消费者对个人健康记录系统的采用:自我决定理论视角
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 27;19(7):e270. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7721.
7
Applying a User-Centered Approach to Building a Mobile Personal Health Record App: Development and Usability Study.应用以用户为中心的方法构建移动个人健康记录应用:开发和可用性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 5;7(7):e13194. doi: 10.2196/13194.
8
Use of the clinical care classification in South Korean nursing practice: Challenges and opportunities.临床护理分类在韩国护理实践中的应用:挑战与机遇。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104968. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104968. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
9
Concept to gain trust for a German personal health record system using public cloud and FHIR.使用公有云和 FHIR 为德国个人健康记录系统赢得信任的概念。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103212. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103212. Epub 2019 May 18.
10
Barriers and facilitators of personal health record adoption in Indonesia: Health facilities' perspectives.印度尼西亚个人健康记录采用的障碍与促进因素:医疗机构的观点。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Mar 22;162:104750. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104750.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors contributing to the quality of nursing care in Gauteng province hospitals.豪登省医院护理质量的影响因素。
Curationis. 2025 Mar 25;48(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2653.
2
A study on user willingness to participate in an adverse drug event information sharing system.一项关于用户参与药物不良事件信息共享系统意愿的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 15;24(1):2837. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20353-8.
3
Quality of Care in Hospitals and the Use of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Applications: An Exploratory Study Using National Hospital Evaluation Data.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Platforms and Functions of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Systems.基于移动设备的个人健康记录系统的平台与功能分析
Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Oct;26(4):311-320. doi: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.4.311. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
2
Understanding Personal Health Record and Facilitating its Market.了解个人健康记录并推动其市场发展。
Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Jul;26(3):248-250. doi: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.3.248. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
3
From EHR to PHR: let's get the record straight.从 EHR 到 PHR:让我们理清记录。
医院护理质量与基于移动设备的个人健康记录应用:一项使用国家医院评估数据的探索性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 23;12(11):1064. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12111064.
4
Hospitals' Adoption of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Systems and Patients' Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study Analyzing National Healthcare Big Data.医院采用基于移动的个人健康记录系统与患者特征:一项利用国家医疗保健大数据进行的分析性横断面研究。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231160892. doi: 10.1177/00469580231160892.
5
Factors Associated with Website Operation among Small Hospitals and Medical and Dental Clinics in Korea.韩国小型医院及医疗和牙科诊所网站运营的相关因素
Healthc Inform Res. 2022 Oct;28(4):355-363. doi: 10.4258/hir.2022.28.4.355. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 18;9(9):e029582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029582.
4
Development of Comprehensive Personal Health Records Integrating Patient-Generated Health Data Directly From Samsung S-Health and Apple Health Apps: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Observational Study.开发综合性个人健康记录,直接整合来自三星 S 健康和苹果健康应用程序的患者生成健康数据:回顾性横断面观察研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 28;7(5):e12691. doi: 10.2196/12691.
5
Infrastructure - the key to healthcare improvement.基础设施——改善医疗保健的关键。
Future Hosp J. 2015 Feb;2(1):4-7. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.2-1-4.
6
Factors that affect the use of electronic personal health records among patients: A systematic review.影响患者使用电子个人健康记录的因素:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:164-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
7
Figure Correction: Health Information Technology in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety: Literature Review.图校正:医疗保健质量与患者安全中的健康信息技术:文献综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Jan 3;7(1):e11320. doi: 10.2196/11320.
8
Association between Electronic Medical Record System Adoption and Healthcare Information Technology Infrastructure.电子病历系统采用与医疗信息技术基础设施之间的关联
Healthc Inform Res. 2018 Oct;24(4):327-334. doi: 10.4258/hir.2018.24.4.327. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
9
Barriers, Facilitators, and Solutions to Optimal Patient Portal and Personal Health Record Use: A Systematic Review of the Literature.优化患者门户网站和个人健康记录使用的障碍、促进因素及解决方案:文献系统综述
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:1913-1922. eCollection 2017.
10
Managing Patient-Generated Health Data Through Mobile Personal Health Records: Analysis of Usage Data.通过移动个人健康记录管理患者生成的健康数据:使用数据的分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 9;6(4):e89. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9620.