Suppr超能文献

在大量接受多次治疗的患者队列中,对利托那韦增强或未增强的阿扎那韦的病毒免疫反应:CARe研究

Viro-immunologic response to ritonavir-boosted or unboosted atazanavir in a large cohort of multiply treated patients: the CARe Study.

作者信息

Santoro Maria Mercedes, Bertoli Ada, Lorenzini Patrizia, Lazzarin Adriano, Esposito Roberto, Carosi Giampiero, Di Perri Giovanni, Filice Gaetano, Moroni Mauro, Rizzardini Giuliano, Caramello Pietro, Maserati Renato, Narciso Pasquale, Cargnel Antonietta, Antinori Andrea, Perno Carlo Federico

机构信息

University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2008 Jan;22(1):7-16. doi: 10.1089/apc.2007.0013.

Abstract

Currently, comparative data able to define the potency of boosted versus unboosted atazanavir in highly pretreated HIV-infected patients are limited. Specifically, in clinical practice it is very important to establish whether atazanavir-boosting with ritonavir warrants potency and efficacy that overcome the profile of unboosted drug. For this reason, our goal was to evaluate viro-immunologic determinants of response to atazanavir, in unboosted ATV400 or boosted ATV300/r formulation, from baseline to week 48 in highly pretreated HIV-infected patients enrolled in a prospective observational Italian study. Data from 354 patients included in an atazanavir "Early Access Program" (AI424-900) with baseline viremia 500 copies per milliliter or more and with an available virologic follow-up were examined using as-treated analysis. Of these, 200 (56.5%) and 154 (43.5%), respectively, received regimens containing ATV300/r or ATV400. Virologic success (VS) was defined as reaching viremia of less than 500 copies per milliliter during follow-up. Estimated median time to VS was 8 weeks in the ATV300/r group and 13 weeks in the ATV400 group. Proportion of patients achieving VS was higher in the ATV300/r group than in ATV400 group at week 12 (66% versus 47%), as well as at week 48 (86% versus 64%). At multivariate Cox regression, receiving ATV300/r dosing was independently associated with increased probability of achieving VS [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-2.06]. Conversely, CDC stage C, higher baseline viral load, and more experience with protease inhibitors (PIs) were associated with poorer virologic response. In an unselected population of highly pretreated HIV-infected individuals, receiving atazanavir as part of antiretroviral regimen results in effective virologic response and immunologic recovery. The antiviral efficacy of atazanavir is greater when boosted with low-dose ritonavir.

摘要

目前,能够界定在接受过大量治疗的HIV感染患者中,增强型与未增强型阿扎那韦效力的比较数据有限。具体而言,在临床实践中,确定使用利托那韦增强阿扎那韦是否能保证其效力和疗效超过未增强药物的情况非常重要。因此,我们的目标是在一项意大利前瞻性观察研究中,评估接受未增强的阿扎那韦400(ATV400)或增强的阿扎那韦300/利托那韦(ATV300/r)治疗方案的、接受过大量治疗的HIV感染患者,从基线到第48周对阿扎那韦反应的病毒免疫学决定因素。使用实际治疗分析方法,对354例纳入阿扎那韦“早期准入计划”(AI424 - 900)、基线病毒血症每毫升500拷贝或更多且有可用病毒学随访数据的患者的数据进行了检查。其中,分别有200例(56.5%)和154例(43.5%)接受了含阿扎那韦300/利托那韦或阿扎那韦400的治疗方案。病毒学成功(VS)定义为随访期间病毒血症降至每毫升500拷贝以下。阿扎那韦300/利托那韦组达到病毒学成功的估计中位时间为8周,阿扎那韦400组为13周。在第12周(66%对47%)以及第48周(86%对64%)时,阿扎那韦300/利托那韦组实现病毒学成功的患者比例高于阿扎那韦400组。在多变量Cox回归分析中,接受阿扎那韦300/利托那韦给药与实现病毒学成功的概率增加独立相关[调整后风险比(AHR):1.57;95%置信区间(CI):1.19 - 2.06]。相反,疾病控制中心C期、更高的基线病毒载量以及更多的蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)使用经验与较差的病毒学反应相关。在一个未经过筛选的、接受过大量治疗的HIV感染个体群体中,将阿扎那韦作为抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的一部分使用可带来有效的病毒学反应和免疫恢复。当与低剂量利托那韦联合使用时,阿扎那韦的抗病毒疗效更佳。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验