Division of Infectious Diseases, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.
AIDS. 2010 Aug 24;24(13):2019-27. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833bee1b.
Treatment simplification strategies involving induction with a ritonavir (RTV)-boosted (/r) protease inhibitor regimen followed by simplification (without RTV) are appealing because they may offer sustained virologic suppression while minimizing potential long-term adverse effects associated with RTV.
This open-label, randomized, noninferiority study enrolled 515 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients to receive abacavir/lamivudine plus atazanavir/RTV (ATV/r) followed by randomization at week 36 (N = 419) to maintain or discontinue RTV for an additional 48 weeks. Eligibility for randomization required confirmed HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml and no virologic failure. Protocol-defined virologic failure after week 36 was confirmed rebound of HIV RNA level at least 400 copies/ml. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml at week 84 (time to loss of virologic response). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00440947.
At week 84, noninferiority of ATV to ATV/r (95% confidence interval around the treatment difference -1.75 to 12.48%) was demonstrated with 181 of 210 (86%) patients in the ATV group and 169 of 209 (81%) in the ATV/r group maintaining HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml. During the randomized phase (weeks 36-84), 10 versus 14% of patients in the ATV and ATV/r arms, respectively, experienced a drug-related grades 2-4 adverse event with hyperbilirubinemia being the most frequently reported (4 versus 10%). The overall rate of protocol-defined virologic failure was 2%; no patient had virus that developed a major protease inhibitor mutation.
ATV in combination with abacavir/lamivudine is a potent and well tolerated regimen in patients who have achieved initial suppression on an induction regimen and represents a viable treatment simplification strategy.
涉及使用利托那韦(RTV)增强的(/r)蛋白酶抑制剂方案诱导,然后简化(无 RTV)的治疗简化策略很有吸引力,因为它们可能提供持续的病毒学抑制,同时最大限度地减少与 RTV 相关的潜在长期不良反应。
这项开放标签、随机、非劣效性研究纳入了 515 名从未接受过抗逆转录病毒治疗的患者,他们接受阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定加阿扎那韦/RTV(ATV/r)治疗,然后在第 36 周(N=419)随机分组,以维持或停止 RTV 治疗另外 48 周。随机分组的资格要求是确认 HIV RNA 水平低于 50 拷贝/ml,且无病毒学失败。第 36 周后确认的方案定义的病毒学失败是指 HIV RNA 水平至少反弹 400 拷贝/ml。主要终点是第 84 周时 HIV RNA 水平低于 50 拷贝/ml的患者比例(病毒学应答丧失时间)。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00440947。
在第 84 周,阿扎那韦与阿扎那韦/r 的非劣效性(治疗差异的置信区间为-1.75 至 12.48%)得到证实,阿扎那韦组 210 名患者中有 181 名(86%)和阿扎那韦/r 组 209 名患者中有 169 名(81%)保持 HIV RNA 水平低于 50 拷贝/ml。在随机分组阶段(第 36-84 周),阿扎那韦组和阿扎那韦/r 组分别有 10%和 14%的患者发生药物相关的 2-4 级不良事件,以高胆红素血症最常见(4%和 10%)。总的方案定义的病毒学失败率为 2%;没有患者出现主要蛋白酶抑制剂突变的病毒。
阿扎那韦联合阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定在初始诱导治疗达到抑制的患者中是一种有效且耐受性良好的方案,代表了一种可行的治疗简化策略。