Public control could be a nightmare for researchers.
作者信息
Graur Dan
出版信息
Nature. 2007 Dec 20;450(7173):1156. doi: 10.1038/4501156b.
DOI:10.1038/4501156b
PMID:18097376
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Public control could be a nightmare for researchers.公共控制对研究人员来说可能是一场噩梦。
Nature. 2007 Dec 20;450(7173):1156. doi: 10.1038/4501156b.
2
Going public.上市。
Nature. 2004 Oct 21;431(7011):883. doi: 10.1038/431883a.
3
Criticism: what to do about science's bad public image?批评：如何应对科学糟糕的公众形象？
Nature. 2006 Nov 16;444(7117):265. doi: 10.1038/444265b.
4
Perspective: powering up citations.
Nature. 2014 Jul 24;511(7510):S77. doi: 10.1038/511S77a.
5
The scientist delusion.
Nature. 2008 Mar 6;452(7183):17. doi: 10.1038/452017a.
6
Academics stress licence threat to US science.
Nature. 2005 May 5;435(7038):4. doi: 10.1038/435004a.
7
Academia must resist political confirmation bias.学术界必须抵制政治确认偏差。
Nature. 2016 Nov 29;540(7631):7. doi: 10.1038/540007a.
8
UK panel urges animal researchers to go public.英国专家小组敦促动物研究人员公开相关情况。
Nature. 2005 May 26;435(7041):392. doi: 10.1038/435392a.
9
The mad technologist.
Nature. 2006 Jun 22;441(7096):908. doi: 10.1038/441908a.
10
A call to arms.
Nature. 2001 May 17;411(6835):223. doi: 10.1038/35077267.
引用本文的文献
1
Public communication of science 2.0: Is the communication of science via the "new media" online a genuine transformation or old wine in new bottles?科学2.0的公众传播：通过在线“新媒体”进行的科学传播是一场真正的变革，还是换汤不换药？
EMBO Rep. 2014 Jul;15(7):749-53. doi: 10.15252/embr.201438979. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
2
Open engagement: exploring public participation in the biosciences.开放参与：探索公众对生物科学的参与
PLoS Biol. 2010 Nov 30;8(11):e1000549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000549.
Zotero 插件