Open engagement: exploring public participation in the biosciences.
作者信息
Marris Claire, Rose Nikolas
出版信息
PLoS Biol. 2010 Nov 30;8(11):e1000549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000549.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Open engagement: exploring public participation in the biosciences.开放参与：探索公众对生物科学的参与
PLoS Biol. 2010 Nov 30;8(11):e1000549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000549.
2
A culture shift to support public involvement and engagement in research.倡导一种支持公众参与研究的文化转变。
J Exp Med. 2024 Jun 3;221(6). doi: 10.1084/jem.20240268. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
A Deep Dive into Community Engagement.深入探究社区参与
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2017;7(1):41-45. doi: 10.1353/nib.2017.0014.
4
Positive reporting? Is there a bias is reporting of patient and public involvement and engagement?积极报道？在患者及公众参与和介入的报道中是否存在偏差？
Health Expect. 2016 Jun;19(3):499-500. doi: 10.1111/hex.12470.
5
Two tribes coming together: patient and public involvement in cancer research.两个群体走到一起：患者与公众参与癌症研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014 Jan;23(1):1-2. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12178.
6
Public engagement and the importance of content, purpose, and timing.公众参与以及内容、目的和时机的重要性。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Nov-Dec;44(6 Spec no.):S40-2. doi: 10.1002/hast.399.
7
Public Engagement, Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking, and the Common Rule.公众参与、公告及评论规则制定与《通用规则》
IRB. 2017 Jan-Feb;39(1):17-9.
8
Quandaries in patient and community engagement in research.
Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 1;34(3):253-255. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx047.
9
Dissemination does not equal public engagement.传播并不等同于公众参与。
J Neurosci. 2015 Mar 18;35(11):4483-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4408-14.2015.
10
Patient and public involvement in infection clinical research.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1121-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
引用本文的文献
1
Incorporating and evaluating citizen engagement in health research: a scoping review protocol.将公民参与纳入并评估卫生研究：范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;10(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01812-4.
2
Demonstrating the Use of Optical Fibres in Biomedical Sensing: A Collaborative Approach for Engagement and Education.展示光纤在生物医学传感中的应用：一种用于参与和教育的协作方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 10;20(2):402. doi: 10.3390/s20020402.
3
Experiments in interdisciplinarity: Responsible research and innovation and the public good.跨学科实验：负责任的研究与创新和公共利益。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 26;16(3):e2003921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003921. eCollection 2018 Mar.
4
Dynamics of problem setting and framing in citizen discussions on synthetic biology.公民对合成生物学讨论中问题设定与框架构建的动态变化
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Apr;27(3):294-309. doi: 10.1177/0963662517712207. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
5
The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care.共同产生了什么？医疗保健中的知识、价值观和社会关系。
PLoS Biol. 2017 May 3;15(5):e2001403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403. eCollection 2017 May.
6
Mapping public engagement with research in a UK University.描绘英国一所大学中公众对研究的参与情况。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0121874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121874. eCollection 2015.
7
Committing to place: the potential of open collaborations for trusted environmental governance.承诺立足之地：开放协作在可信环境治理方面的潜力。
PLoS Biol. 2015 Mar 5;13(3):e1002081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002081. eCollection 2015 Mar.
8
Developments in the tools and methodologies of synthetic biology.合成生物学工具和方法的发展。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2014 Nov 26;2:60. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00060. eCollection 2014.
9
Grant application review: the case of transparency.科研基金申请评审：透明度问题
PLoS Biol. 2014 Dec 2;12(12):e1002010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002010. eCollection 2014 Dec.
10
Making de-extinction mundane?使灭绝物种复活变得平凡？
PLoS Biol. 2014 Mar 25;12(3):e1001825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001825. eCollection 2014 Mar.
本文引用的文献
1
Public control could be a nightmare for researchers.公共控制对研究人员来说可能是一场噩梦。
Nature. 2007 Dec 20;450(7173):1156. doi: 10.1038/4501156b.
Zotero 插件