• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of anal manipulation and pouch design on ileal pouch function.肛门操作和贮袋设计对回肠贮袋功能的影响。
J Natl Med Assoc. 1991 Dec;83(12):1089-92.
2
Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa.一项随机前瞻性试验,比较切除肛管黏膜的回肠储袋肛管吻合术与保留肛管黏膜的回肠储袋肛管吻合术。
Ann Surg. 1997 Jun;225(6):666-76; discussion 676-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199706000-00004.
3
Functional comparison between double and triple ileal loop pouches.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Jan;34(1):17-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02050201.
4
Can a meta-analysis answer the question: is mucosectomy and handsewn or double-stapled anastomosis better in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis?一项荟萃分析能否回答以下问题:在回肠储袋肛管吻合术中,黏膜切除术与手工缝合或双吻合器吻合哪种方式更好?
Am Surg. 2006 Oct;72(10):912-6.
5
A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients.直肠结肠切除术后手工缝合与吻合器回肠袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)的比较:4183例患者的荟萃分析
Ann Surg. 2006 Jul;244(1):18-26. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225031.15405.a3.
6
Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation.
Am J Surg. 1991 Jan;161(1):90-5; discussion 95-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90366-l.
7
Mucosectomy vs. stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: functional outcome and neoplasia control.家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者行黏膜切除术与吻合器回肠储袋肛管吻合术的功能结局及肿瘤控制情况
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Nov;44(11):1590-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02234377.
8
Late functional adaptation after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
Surgery. 1991 Oct;110(4):718-24; discussion 725.
9
Recovery of the internal anal sphincter and continence after restorative proctocolectomy.恢复性直肠结肠切除术后肛门内括约肌的恢复与控便功能
Br J Surg. 1994 Jul;81(7):1065-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810748.
10
Internal anal sphincter function after total abdominal colectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Nov;32(11):950-3. doi: 10.1007/BF02552271.

引用本文的文献

1
Peristaltic contractility: another factor impacting IPAA function?蠕动收缩性:影响回肠肛管吻合术功能的另一个因素?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 May 2;40(1):106. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04898-7.
2
Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.手工缝合与吻合器用于闭合袢式回肠造口术——一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Feb;400(2):193-205. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1265-8. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
3
Is age relevant to functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis?: prospective assessment of 122 cases.年龄与溃疡性结肠炎行保留肛门的直肠结肠切除术后的功能结局有关吗?:122例病例的前瞻性评估
Ann Surg. 1998 Feb;227(2):187-94. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199802000-00006.

本文引用的文献

1
Straight ileoanal anastomosis v ileal pouch--anal anastomosis after colectomy and mucosal proctectomy.结肠切除和黏膜直肠切除术后的直回肠肛管吻合术与回肠储袋肛管吻合术对比
Arch Surg. 1983 Jun;118(6):696-701. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390060018004.
2
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs.用于溃疡性结肠炎和家族性腺瘤性息肉病的带回肠储袋的恢复性直肠结肠切除术:三种储袋设计的比较
Br J Surg. 1985 Jun;72(6):470-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720622.
3
Mechanisms of rectal continence. Lessons from the ileoanal procedure.直肠节制机制。回肠肛管手术的经验教训。
Am J Surg. 1985 Jan;149(1):31-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(85)80005-2.
4
Stapled ileo-anal anastomosis: a technique to avoid mucosal proctectomy in the ileal pouch operation.吻合器回肠肛管吻合术:一种在回肠储袋手术中避免黏膜直肠切除术的技术。
Br J Surg. 1986 Jul;73(7):571-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730719.
5
Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.回肠贮袋肛管吻合术后影响肠道功能的因素。
Br J Surg. 1986 Jun;73(6):469-73. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730617.
6
Achieving enteric continence: principles and applications.
Mayo Clin Proc. 1986 Jul;61(7):586-99. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62009-6.
7
Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endo-anal anastomosis.溃疡性结肠炎保肛全直肠系膜切除术:一项比较不切除黏膜的端端回肠肛管吻合术与黏膜直肠切除术及经肛门吻合术的初步研究。
Br J Surg. 1987 Oct;74(10):940-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800741020.
8
S-pouches vs. J-pouches. A comparison of functional outcomes.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1987 Sep;30(9):671-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02561686.
9
The S ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.回肠储袋肛管吻合术
World J Surg. 1987 Dec;11(6):742-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01656597.
10
Anal canal pressure and motility after ileoanal anastomosis.回肠肛管吻合术后肛管压力与动力
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1988 Jan;166(1):47-54.

肛门操作和贮袋设计对回肠贮袋功能的影响。

Impact of anal manipulation and pouch design on ileal pouch function.

作者信息

Tuckson W B, McNamara M J, Fazio V W, Lavery I C, Oakley J R

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 1991 Dec;83(12):1089-92.

PMID:1813639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2571687/
Abstract

The frequency of defecation, leakage, maximum resting pressure, and maximum squeeze pressure of the anal canal, maximum tolerated volume, and pouch compliance were evaluated in 116 consecutive patients following total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) and after temporary ileostomy closure. Sixty-nine patients had a double ileal loop pouch ("J") and 47 a triple ("S") design. Seventy patients had mucosal proctectomy and hand-sewn IPAA (mucosectomy) and 46 a stapled IPAA without mucosal proctectomy (stapled). Fifty percent of the S and 30% of the J pouch patients did not have nocturnal defecations. The avoidance of anal manipulation in the stapled group resulted in higher anal canal resting pressures and a lower incidence of leakage. The maximum tolerated volume and compliance was greater in the S pouch group than in the J group. Although the median frequency of defecation was equal in both pouch groups, fewer S pouch patients had nocturnal defecations. Anal canal resting tone may be the primary factor affecting continence following TPC and IPAA, but a compliant pouch may prevent leakage if sphincter function is compromised.

摘要

对116例接受全直肠结肠切除术(TPC)并进行回肠储袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)的连续患者,以及临时回肠造口关闭后,评估其排便频率、渗漏情况、肛管最大静息压力、最大收缩压力、最大耐受容量和储袋顺应性。69例患者采用双回肠袢储袋(“J”形),47例采用三回肠袢储袋(“S”形)。70例患者行黏膜直肠切除术并手工缝合IPAA(黏膜切除术),46例采用无黏膜直肠切除术的吻合器IPAA(吻合器术)。50%的“S”形储袋患者和30%的“J”形储袋患者无夜间排便。吻合器组避免了肛门操作,导致肛管静息压力较高,渗漏发生率较低。“S”形储袋组的最大耐受容量和顺应性大于“J”形储袋组。虽然两组储袋患者的排便频率中位数相等,但“S”形储袋患者夜间排便较少。肛管静息张力可能是影响TPC和IPAA术后控便的主要因素,但如果括约肌功能受损,顺应性好的储袋可能预防渗漏。