Hinkley S A, Reader A, Beck M, Meyers W J
Department of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.
Anesth Prog. 1991 May-Jun;38(3):84-9.
The purpose of this study was to measure the degree of anesthesia obtained with 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin compared with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block. Using a repeated measures design, 30 subjects randomly received an inferior alveolar injection using masked cartridges of each solution at three successive appointments. The first molar, first premolar, lateral incisor, and contralateral canine (control) were blindly tested with an Analytic Technology pulp tester at 3-min cycles for 50 min. Anesthetic success was defined as no subject response to the maximum output of the pulp tester (80 reading) within 16 min and maintenance of this reading for the remainder of the testing period.Although subjects felt numb subjectively, anesthetic success as defined here occurred in 46% to 57% of the molars, in 50% to 57% of the premolars, and in 21% to 36% of the lateral incisors. No statistically significant differences in onset, success, failure, or incidence were found among the solutions. We conclude that the three preparations are equivalent for inferior alveolar nerve block of 50-min duration.
本研究的目的是测量与含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因相比,含1:200,000肾上腺素的4%丙胺卡因和含1:20,000左诺孕酮的2%甲哌卡因用于下牙槽神经阻滞时所获得的麻醉程度。采用重复测量设计,30名受试者在三次连续就诊时,使用每种溶液的遮蔽药筒随机接受一次下牙槽注射。在50分钟内,每隔3分钟使用Analytic Technology牙髓活力测试仪对第一磨牙、第一前磨牙、侧切牙和对侧尖牙(对照)进行盲法测试。麻醉成功定义为在16分钟内无受试者对牙髓活力测试仪的最大输出(80读数)产生反应,且在测试期的剩余时间内维持该读数。尽管受试者主观上感觉麻木,但按此处定义的麻醉成功在46%至57%的磨牙、50%至57%的前磨牙和21%至36%的侧切牙中出现。在这些溶液之间,未发现起效、成功、失败或发生率方面的统计学显著差异。我们得出结论,这三种制剂在50分钟时长的下牙槽神经阻滞中效果相当。