Suppr超能文献

论护理中不同类型的尊严:对诺德费尔特的批判

On different types of dignity in nursing care: a critique of Nordenfelt.

作者信息

Wainwright Paul, Gallagher Ann

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, Kingston University , Kingston upon Thames, UK.

出版信息

Nurs Philos. 2008 Jan;9(1):46-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2007.00329.x.

Abstract

Dignity appears to be an important concept in nursing philosophy and more widely in health care policy and provision. Recent events in the UK have generated much interest in the subject. However, there appears to be some confusion about the precise meaning and application of the concept. An influential contribution to the debate has come from Nordenfelt, who, as part of a European project investigating dignity and the care of older people, has proposed a four-part typology of dignity. In this article, we will explore some of the background to the dignity debate in UK nursing and health care, give a brief overview of Nordenfelt's position, offer some criticisms of his work and propose some modifications to his view.

摘要

尊严似乎是护理理念中的一个重要概念,在更广泛的医疗保健政策与服务中亦是如此。英国近期发生的事件引发了人们对该主题的浓厚兴趣。然而,对于这一概念的确切含义及应用,似乎存在一些混淆。诺登费尔特对这场辩论做出了有影响力的贡献,他作为一个研究尊严与老年人护理的欧洲项目的一部分,提出了一种尊严的四分法类型学。在本文中,我们将探讨英国护理与医疗保健领域尊严辩论的一些背景,简要概述诺登费尔特的观点,对他的工作提出一些批评,并对他的观点提出一些修正。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验