Galvin Kathleen, Todres Les
Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Jun;21(3):410-8. doi: 10.1111/jep.12278. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
In this paper, we draw on a phenomenological-philosophical foundation to clarify the meaning of dignity as a coherent phenomenon. Consistent with an evocation of its central meanings, we then introduce and delineate seven kinds of dignity that are intertwined and interrelated. We illustrate how these kinds of dignity can provide a useful template to think about its qualities, its 'rupture' and its 'restoration' in human life, particularly in relation to health and social care contexts. We then consider the implications of these relational and experiential views for current debates about the notion of dignity: Is dignity a useless concept? Is dignity objective or subjective? What are the useful ways of characterizing different varieties of dignity? We conclude by pointing to a metaphor that may hold the sense and meaning of our deepest human dignity: The gathering of both value and vulnerability, in which human value does not depend on the eradication of human vulnerability, but occurs within its very context.
在本文中,我们借助现象学 - 哲学基础来阐明尊严作为一种连贯现象的意义。与对其核心意义的唤起相一致,我们接着引入并描绘了相互交织、相互关联的七种尊严。我们说明了这些尊严如何能为思考其在人类生活中的特质、“断裂”及“修复”提供一个有用的模板,特别是在健康和社会护理背景下。然后,我们思考这些关系性和体验性观点对当前关于尊严概念的争论的影响:尊严是一个无用的概念吗?尊严是客观的还是主观的?描述不同种类尊严的有用方式有哪些?我们通过指出一个可能承载我们最深层次人类尊严的意义和内涵的隐喻来作结:价值与脆弱性的汇聚,其中人类价值并非取决于消除人类脆弱性,而是在其背景中产生。