Suppr超能文献

使用锥形束计算机断层扫描在体外识别根管系统。

Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro.

作者信息

Matherne Ryan P, Angelopoulos Christos, Kulild James C, Tira Daniel

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Dentistry, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.

出版信息

J Endod. 2008 Jan;34(1):87-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.10.016.

Abstract

This study investigated the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a diagnostic tool for identifying root canal systems (RCSs) when compared with images obtained by using charged coupled device (CCD) and photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP) digital radiography in vitro. Seventy-two extracted teeth were exposed with CCD, PSP, and CBCT radiography. Specimens included 24 maxillary molars, mandibular premolars, and mandibular incisors each. Tooth-type selections were based on the greater possibility of multiple RCSs. Three board-certified endodontists evaluated CCD and PSP images to determine the number of RCSs. CBCT images were used to establish "ground truth" for the comparisons and were evaluated by a board-certified oral and maxillofacial radiologist who determined the number of RCSs. Descriptive statistical analysis revealed that the endodontists consistently agreed among themselves. When compared with CBCT evaluation, the endodontists, on average, failed to identify 1 or more RCSs in 41% of the teeth with CCD and 40% of the time with PSP. CBCT evaluations identified an average of 3.58 RCSs per maxillary molar, 1.21 per mandibular premolar, and 1.5 per mandibular incisor. Evaluation of CCD images demonstrated an average number of 1.0 RCSs per mandibular incisor, 1.0 per mandibular first premolar, and 3.1 per maxillary molar. Evaluation of PSP images demonstrated an average number of 1.3 RCSs per mandibular incisor, 1.1 per mandibular first premolar, and 3.0 per maxillary molar. In summary, endodontist evaluators with either CCD or PSP methods failed to identify at least 1 RCS in approximately 4 of 10 teeth, which can result in a less optimal healing outcome if a missed RCS is left uninstrumented and unobturated.

摘要

本研究调查了与使用电荷耦合器件(CCD)和光激励荧光板(PSP)数字射线摄影术在体外获得的图像相比,锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)作为识别根管系统(RCS)的诊断工具的应用情况。72颗离体牙接受了CCD、PSP和CBCT射线摄影。标本包括24颗上颌磨牙、下颌前磨牙和下颌切牙各24颗。牙齿类型的选择基于多根管系统的可能性更大。三名获得委员会认证的牙髓病医生评估CCD和PSP图像以确定根管系统的数量。CBCT图像用于建立比较的“金标准”,并由一名获得委员会认证的口腔颌面放射科医生进行评估,该医生确定根管系统的数量。描述性统计分析显示,牙髓病医生之间的意见始终一致。与CBCT评估相比,牙髓病医生平均在41%的使用CCD的牙齿和40%的使用PSP的牙齿中未能识别出1个或更多的根管系统。CBCT评估显示,每颗上颌磨牙平均有3.58个根管系统,每颗下颌前磨牙有1.21个,每颗下颌切牙有1.5个。对CCD图像的评估显示,每颗下颌切牙平均有1.0个根管系统,每颗下颌第一前磨牙有1.0个,每颗上颌磨牙有3.1个。对PSP图像的评估显示,每颗下颌切牙平均有1.3个根管系统,每颗下颌第一前磨牙有1.1个,每颗上颌磨牙有3.0个。总之,使用CCD或PSP方法的牙髓病医生评估者在大约十分之四的牙齿中未能识别出至少1个根管系统,如果遗漏的根管系统未进行器械预备和充填,可能会导致愈合效果欠佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验