Suppr超能文献

嵌甲的部分甲床切除术或甲矫形术

Partial matrix excision or orthonyxia for ingrowing toenails.

作者信息

Kruijff Schelto, van Det Robert J, van der Meer Gretha T, van den Berg Inez C M A E, van der Palen Job, Geelkerken Robert H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Jan;206(1):148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.296. Epub 2007 Sep 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We wanted to evaluate whether partial matrix excision and orthonyxia are equally effective in the treatment of ingrown toenails of the hallux.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial with 12-month observer-blinded followup, in the surgical outpatient department of a teaching hospital. We randomized 105 consecutive patients with a total of 109 ingrown toenails to either partial matrix excision (n=58) or an orthonyxia procedure (n=51). The main outcomes measurements were rate of recurrence after 12 months, postoperative morbidity, and time to complete recovery.

RESULTS

The 12-month followup was completed in 55 of 58 patients undergoing partial matrix excision and 47 of 51 patients having orthonyxia. There were four ingrown toenails, four recurrences in the partial matrix excision group, and eight in the orthonyxia group (NS, p=0.14). Postoperative morbidity parameters (redness, pus, postoperative bleeding); time to complete recovery, wearing shoes (p < 0.01), and performing activities of daily living and hobbies; postoperative symptoms; and patient satisfaction all favored orthonyxia.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial matrix excision and orthonyxia are equally effective treatments for ingrown toenails. But the orthonyxia procedure showed better results, with less postoperative morbidity, shorter time to complete recovery, fewer postoperative symptoms, and greater patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

我们想要评估部分甲床切除术和正甲术在治疗拇趾嵌甲方面是否同样有效。

研究设计

我们在一家教学医院的外科门诊进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验,随访12个月且观察者设盲。我们将105例连续患者共109个嵌甲随机分为部分甲床切除术组(n = 58)或正甲术组(n = 51)。主要观察指标为12个月后的复发率、术后发病率以及完全恢复时间。

结果

58例接受部分甲床切除术的患者中有55例完成了12个月的随访,51例接受正甲术的患者中有47例完成了随访。部分甲床切除术组有4个嵌甲复发,正甲术组有8个(无统计学差异,p = 0.14)。术后发病率参数(发红、化脓、术后出血);完全恢复时间、穿鞋情况(p < 0.01)以及进行日常生活活动和爱好的情况;术后症状;以及患者满意度均表明正甲术更具优势。

结论

部分甲床切除术和正甲术在治疗嵌甲方面同样有效。但正甲术显示出更好的效果,术后发病率更低,完全恢复时间更短,术后症状更少,患者满意度更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验