“允许自然死亡”与“不进行心肺复苏”：三个能改变人生的词。
"Allow natural death" versus "do not resuscitate": three words that can change a life.
作者信息
Venneman S S, Narnor-Harris P, Perish M, Hamilton M
机构信息
University of Houston-Victoria, Department of Psychology, Victoria, Texas 77901, USA.
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 2008 Jan;34(1):2-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.018317.
Physician-written "do not resuscitate" DNR orders elicit negative reactions from stakeholders that may decrease appropriate end-of-life care. The semantic significance of the phrase has led to a proposed replacement of DNR with "allow natural death" (AND). Prior to this investigation, no scientific papers address the impact of such a change. Our results support this proposition due to increased likelihood of endorsement with the term AND.
医生书写的“不要复苏”（DNR）医嘱会引发利益相关者的负面反应，这可能会减少适当的临终护理。该短语的语义意义导致有人提议用“允许自然死亡”（AND）取代DNR。在本次调查之前，没有科学论文探讨这种变化的影响。我们的结果支持这一主张，因为使用AND一词获得认可的可能性增加了。
Zotero 插件