Miyanji Firoz, Mahar Andrew, Oka Richard, Pring Maya, Wenger Dennis
Department of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):49-52. doi: 10.1097/bpo.0b013e31815a5fa4.
Previous data have shown that an equal number of threads on each side of the physis maximizes stability for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) fixation. The purpose of the current study was to determine if a fully threaded cancellous screw provides greater stability compared with a partially threaded screw in a porcine model.
Twenty skeletally immature porcine femurs were sectioned, and a 30-degree angular wedge was resected from the femoral neck to simulate SCFE. Femora were randomly assigned to partially threaded (16 mm) or fully threaded screw groups (n = 10/group). Kirschner wires were inserted in a retrograde fashion to stabilize the proximal fragment. Each 7.3-mm-diameter screw was placed using fluoroscopic guidance to obtain 3 threads crossing the physis. Specimens were fixed in custom fixation rigs, and the epiphyseal fragment was loaded at 0.5 mm/s in a posterior-inferior direction to simulate slip progression. Data for displacement (in millimeters) and force (in newtons) were collected for the entire test. Forces at 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm of fragment displacement were compared between groups using a 1-way analysis of variance (p < 0.05).
Increasing epiphyseal displacements were associated with incremental increases in loading. There were no significant differences between fully threaded or partially threaded screws for loads at each displacement. Each stepwise increase in displacement was associated with approximately 325 N of force.
There was no biomechanical benefit when using a fully threaded screw for stabilization of an in vitro SCFE model.
Although there were no differences between screw types in an in vitro model, bone healing around the fully threaded screw may eventually provide greater stability. The use of fully threaded screw remains a reasonable option in the treatment of SCFE, and implant removal may be easier with such a system. Further studies are warranted to verify these 2 points.
既往数据表明,在股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)固定时,骨骺两侧使用相同数量的螺纹可使稳定性最大化。本研究的目的是在猪模型中确定全螺纹松质骨螺钉与部分螺纹螺钉相比是否能提供更大的稳定性。
选取20根骨骼未成熟的猪股骨,进行截骨,并从股骨颈切除一个30度角的楔形骨块以模拟SCFE。将股骨随机分为部分螺纹(16 mm)或全螺纹螺钉组(每组n = 10)。以逆行方式插入克氏针以稳定近端骨块。每枚直径7.3 mm的螺钉在透视引导下置入,使3条螺纹穿过骨骺。将标本固定在定制的固定装置中,以0.5 mm/s的速度向后下方向加载骨骺骨块以模拟滑脱进展。在整个测试过程中收集位移(毫米)和力(牛顿)数据。使用单因素方差分析比较两组在骨块位移2、4、6和8 mm时的力(p < 0.05)。
骨骺位移增加与加载力的逐渐增加相关。在每个位移处,全螺纹螺钉和部分螺纹螺钉的载荷之间无显著差异。位移的每一步增加与约325 N的力相关。
在体外SCFE模型中使用全螺纹螺钉进行稳定固定并无生物力学优势。
尽管在体外模型中螺钉类型之间没有差异,但全螺纹螺钉周围的骨愈合最终可能提供更大的稳定性。在SCFE的治疗中,使用全螺纹螺钉仍然是一个合理的选择,并且使用这样的系统可能更容易取出植入物。有必要进行进一步研究以验证这两点。